Literature DB >> 12536273

Should the autopsy be resuscitated?

F Lemaire1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12536273     DOI： 10.1007/s00134-002-1630-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN： 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically iII patients and subsequent autopsy findings.

Authors:  J Roosen; E Frans; A Wilmer; D C Knockaert; H Bobbaers
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done.

Authors:  S J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  P Fernandez-Segoviano; A Lázaro; A Esteban; J M Rubio; J R Iruretagoyena
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Pathologists request autopsy revival.

Authors:  C Marwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Autopsy: moribund art or vital science?

Authors:  S J McPhee; K Bottles
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU.

Authors:  A L Gut; A L Ferreira; M R Montenegro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: effect of clinical criteria on incidence estimates.

Authors:  J P Brandel; N Delasnerie-Lauprêtre; J L Laplanche; J J Hauw; A Alpérovitch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10003 autopsies from 418 institutions.

Authors:  P B Baker; R J Zarbo; P J Howanitz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  A comparison of public attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation, and anatomic dissection. A Swedish survey.

Authors:  M Sanner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected?

Authors:  S A Blosser; H E Zimmerman; J L Stauffer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.598
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: What is the role for autopsy in the ICU?

Authors:  Greet Yvonne Agnes De Vlieger; Elien Marie Jeanne Lia Mahieu; Wouter Meersseman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Who is at risk for diagnostic discrepancies? Comparison of pre- and postmortal diagnoses in 1800 patients of 3 medical decades in East and West Berlin.

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Frederick Klauschen; Anna-Christin Kimmritz; Moritz von Winterfeld; Carsten Kamphues; Hans-Joachim Scholman; Andreas Erbersdobler; Heidi Pfeiffer; Carsten Denkert; Manfred Dietel; Wilko Weichert; Jan Budczies; Albrecht Stenzinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Is it better to consent to an RCT or to care? Muetadeltaepsilonnu alphagammaalphanu ("nothing in excess").

Authors:  Didier Dreyfuss
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 17.440
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.