Literature DB >> 12534766

Measuring errors and adverse events in health care.

Eric J Thomas1, Laura A Petersen.   

Abstract

In this paper, we identify 8 methods used to measure errors and adverse events in health care and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. We focus on the reliability and validity of each, as well as the ability to detect latent errors (or system errors) versus active errors and adverse events. We propose a general framework to help health care providers, researchers, and administrators choose the most appropriate methods to meet their patient safety measurement goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12534766      PMCID: PMC1494808          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20147.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  40 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.

Authors:  J B Sexton; E J Thomas; R L Helmreich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

Review 3.  Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems.

Authors:  P Barach; S D Small
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

4.  Epidemiology of medical error.

Authors:  S N Weingart; R M Wilson; R W Gibberd; B Harrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

5.  The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors--could it do harm?

Authors:  T A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Error in medicine: what have we learned?

Authors:  D W Bates; A A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.

Authors:  J Luck; J W Peabody; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee; P Glassman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Standards for patient monitoring during anesthesia at Harvard Medical School.

Authors:  J H Eichhorn; J B Cooper; D J Cullen; W R Maier; J H Philip; R G Seeman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Aug 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

Authors:  L Goldman; R Sayson; S Robbins; L H Cohn; M Bettmann; M Weisberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.996

View more
  97 in total

1.  Case record review of adverse events: a new approach.

Authors:  M Woloshynowych; G Neale; C Vincent
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

2.  Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning.

Authors:  K Henriksen; H Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

3.  Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools.

Authors:  R K Resar; J D Rozich; D Classen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

4.  Active surveillance using electronic triggers to detect adverse events in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  M K Szekendi; C Sullivan; A Bobb; J Feinglass; D Rooney; C Barnard; G A Noskin
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

5.  Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. An analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals.

Authors:  Catherine E Milch; Deeb N Salem; Stephen G Pauker; Thomas G Lundquist; Sanjaya Kumar; Jack Chen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Clinical impact associated with corrected results in clinical microbiology testing.

Authors:  Shan Yuan; Michael L Astion; Jeff Schapiro; Ajit P Limaye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  The incidence of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: an overview of the research methods.

Authors:  Bryony Dean Franklin; Charles Vincent; Mike Schachter; Nick Barber
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  An educational intervention to enhance nurse leaders' perceptions of patient safety culture.

Authors:  Liane Ginsburg; Peter G Norton; Ann Casebeer; Steven Lewis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Errors and adverse events in family medicine: developing and validating a Canadian taxonomy of errors.

Authors:  Sarah Jacobs; Maeve O'Beirne; Luz Palacios Derfiingher; Lucie Vlach; Walter Rosser; Neil Drummond
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Measuring quality of care in syncope: case definition affects reported electrocardiogram use but does not bias reporting.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Amy Justice
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.