Literature DB >> 11923158

Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study.

Malcolm Brodlie1, Ian A Laing, Jean W Keeling, Kathryn J McKenzie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the neonatal autopsy rate at a tertiary referral centre and identify trends over the past decade. To identify factors that may influence the likelihood of consent being given for autopsy. To examine any discordance between diagnoses before death and at autopsy.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients' records.
SETTING: Tertiary neonatal referral centre affiliated to university. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex, gestational age, birth weight, type of delivery, and length of stay in neonatal unit for baby. Maternal age, marital status, history of previous pregnancies, and details of who requested permission for autopsy. Concordance between diagnoses before death and at autopsy.
RESULTS: An autopsy was performed in 209/314 (67%) cases. New information was obtained in 50 (26%) autopsies. In six (3%) cases this information was crucial for future counselling. In 145 (74%) there was complete concordance between the clinical cause of death and the findings at autopsy. From 1994 onwards the autopsy rate in the neonatal unit fell. The only significant factor associated with consent for autopsy was increased gestational age.
CONCLUSIONS: Important extra information can be gained at neonatal autopsies. This should help parents to make an informed decision when they are asked to give permission for their baby to have an autopsy. These findings are of particular relevance in view of the recent negative publicity surrounding neonatal autopsies and the general decline in the neonatal autopsy rate over the decade studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923158      PMCID: PMC100315          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7340.761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  23 in total

1.  The autopsy as a vehicle for the lifetime education of pathologists.

Authors:  M Berthrong
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Talking to the family after an autopsy.

Authors:  C S Hirsch
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  The postautopsy conference with families.

Authors:  M Valdes-Dapena
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Lay perceptions of autopsy.

Authors:  H G Brown
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Follow-up families who experience a perinatal death.

Authors:  J Rowe; R Clyman; C Green; C Mikkelsen; J Haight; L Ataide
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

Authors:  L Goldman; R Sayson; S Robbins; L H Cohn; M Bettmann; M Weisberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Requesting the autopsy: a pediatric perspective. Psychosocial and professional aspects of the autopsy in caring for the dying child and his family.

Authors:  L R Berger
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.168

8.  Factors influencing neonatal autopsy rate.

Authors:  W M Maniscalco; T A Clarke
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1982-09

9.  Perinatal autopsy: its clinical value.

Authors:  P R Meier; D K Manchester; R H Shikes; W H Clewell; M Stewart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Autopsy. High yield in neonatal population.

Authors:  H Craft; J E Brazy
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1986-12
View more
  30 in total

1.  Falling neonatal autopsy rates.

Authors:  T Yee Khong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

2.  Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  P A Boyd; F Tondi; N R Hicks; P F Chamberlain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-08

Review 3.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Perinatal and infant autopsy.

Authors:  R Adappa; S Paranjothy; Z Roberts; P H T Cartlidge
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Diagnostic utility of autopsy in a university hospital in Iran.

Authors:  Payman Salamati; Afshin Abdi-Rad; Mehdi Ale-Hossein; Soheila Sarmadi; Kambiz Sotoudeh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  The use of magnetic resonance in the hospital and coronial pediatric postmortem examination.

Authors:  M C Cohen; E Whitby
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Termination of pregnancy for renal malformations.

Authors:  Eva Simoens; An Hindryckx; Philippe Moerman; Filip Claus; Luc De Catte
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  The Value of Autopsy in Neonates in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Joline L H de Sévaux; Peter G J Nikkels; Maarten H Lequin; Floris Groenendaal
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy in the investigation of unexpected death in infants and children.

Authors:  Maïa Proisy; Antoine Jérôme Marchand; Philippe Loget; Renaud Bouvet; Michel Roussey; Fabienne Pelé; Céline Rozel; Catherine Treguier; Pierre Darnault; Bertrand Bruneau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications.

Authors:  Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.