Literature DB >> 15480565

Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

George Dimopoulos1, Michael Piagnerelli, Jacques Berré, Isabelle Salmon, Jean-Louis Vincent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Post mortem examination rates have decreased worldwide and their usefulness has been challenged. The aim of this study was to compare ante- versus post mortem findings in a multidisciplinary ICU.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Thirty-one-bed, medico-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: All patients who died on the ICU and underwent an autopsy examination in 1999. MEASUREMENTS: Records from autopsies were compared with clinical records. A modified Goldman's criteria was used to categorize the post mortem diagnoses. Unexpected findings were evaluated according to the duration of hospitalization prior to death (fewer than or more than 10 days).
RESULTS: Among 2,984 ICU admissions, there were 489 deaths; 222 autopsies were conducted (45.4% autopsy rate). Post mortem examination revealed unexpected findings in 50 patients (22.5%), including malignancy (22 [9.9%]), fungal infections (9 [4%]), pulmonary embolism (7 [3.2%]), nosocomial infections (3 [1.3%]), Hashimoto's disease (3 [1.3%]), mesenteric infarction (2 [0.9%]), Barrett's esophagus (2 [0.9%]), endocarditis (1 [0.5%]) and myocardial infarction (1 [0.5%]). These unexpected findings were considered as major (Class I/II) in 19 (8.5%), and minor (Class III) in 31 (14%) patients. In patients with a short ICU length of stay (<10 days), there were more major unexpected findings than minor, while after a prolonged stay (>10 days), minor unexpected findings were more common.
CONCLUSIONS: After a short ICU stay (<10 days), autopsy revealed discrepancies primarily related to the cause of death associated with diseases whose diagnosis can be difficult. Following more prolonged ICU stays (>10 days), autopsy was more likely to reveal coexisting diseases unrelated to death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480565     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2448-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  34 in total

1.  Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Mourad Mokhtari; Anne Couvelard; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Jérôme Baudot; Dominique Hénin; Claude Gibert; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-02-23

2.  Diagnostic yield from 231 autopsies in a community hospital.

Authors:  M G Rao; A F Rangwala
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Resurrecting the autopsy: benefits and recommendations.

Authors:  P N Nemetz; C M Beard; D J Ballard; J Ludwig; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen; K M Weigel; P G Belau; W M Bourne; L T Kurland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  P Fernandez-Segoviano; A Lázaro; A Esteban; J M Rubio; J R Iruretagoyena
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras.

Authors:  B Veress; I Alafuzoff
Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care       Date:  1993-12

6.  Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU.

Authors:  A L Gut; A L Ferreira; M R Montenegro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected?

Authors:  S A Blosser; H E Zimmerman; J L Stauffer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  V R Sarode; B N Datta; A K Banerjee; C K Banerjee; K Joshi; B Bhusnurmath; B D Radotra
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Misdiagnosis at a university hospital in 4 medical eras.

Authors:  W Kirch; C Schafii
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; Danny F McAuley; Sarah Davies; Fang Gao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  12 in total

1.  Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?

Authors:  J P Rigaud; J P Quenot; M Borel; I Plu; C Hervé; G Moutel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  J G Zijlstra; J J M Ligtenberg; J E Tulleken; T S van der Werf
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of invasive fungal infections in adult patients. Prophylaxis, empirical, preemptive or targeted therapy, which is the best in the different hosts?

Authors:  Rafael Zaragoza; Javier Pemán; Miguel Salavert; Angel Viudes; Amparo Solé; Isidro Jarque; Emilio Monte; Eva Romá; Emilia Cantón
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Autopsy and critical care.

Authors:  Adrian Wong; Michael Osborn; Carl Waldmann
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 6.  Clinical review: What is the role for autopsy in the ICU?

Authors:  Greet Yvonne Agnes De Vlieger; Elien Marie Jeanne Lia Mahieu; Wouter Meersseman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Circumstances surrounding dying in the paediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jetske ten Berge; Dana-Anne H de Gast-Bakker; Frans B Plötz
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Major discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill cancer patients: Is autopsy still useful?

Authors:  Owais Khawaja; Mohammad Khalil; Omar Zmeili; Ayman O Soubani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2013-07

9.  Voriconazole in the management of nosocomial invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  Javier Pemán; Miguel Salavert; Emilia Cantón; Isidro Jarque; Eva Romá; Rafael Zaragoza; Angel Viudes; Miguel Gobernado
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephen M Pastores; Alina Dulu; Louis Voigt; Nina Raoof; Margarita Alicea; Neil A Halpern
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.