Literature DB >> 286338

Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

W W Anderson, L Levine, O Olvera, J R Powell, M E de la Rosa, V M Salceda, M I Gaso, J Guzmán.   

Abstract

Gene arrangement frequencies were determined at two stages in the life history of Drosophila pseudoobscura taken from nature. Three populations in the central highlands of Mexico were each sampled twice during 1976. Gene arrangement frequencies were measured in adult males and in larvae that were the offspring of females collected at the same time. The adult males were in all likelihood a representative sample of those who fathered the larvae produced by the wild females. Differences in gene arrangement frequency between these two life stages should indicate the operation of natural selection. One-third of our comparisons of common gene arrangement frequencies in males and in larvae from the next generation were statistically significant, as were one-third of our comparisons of total frequency arrays in the two life stages. We consider the components of selection that could produce such frequency changes and reason that male mating success must be the major one. Gene arrangement frequencies in the Mexican populations fluctuate within wide bounds. Selection must act to retain the polymorphism in the face of this flux in gene arrangement frequencies, and we suggest that male mating success plays an important role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 286338      PMCID: PMC383286          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Enzymes and reproduction in natural populations of Drosophila euronotus.

Authors:  H D Stalker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimation of life cycle components of selection in an experimental plant population.

Authors:  M T Clegg; A L Kahler; R W Allard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Relation between Fitness Components and Population Prediction in Drosophila. I: The Estimation of Fitness Components.

Authors:  T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetics of Zoarces populations. IV. Selection component analysis of an esterase polymorphism using population samples including mother-offspring combinations.

Authors:  F B Christiansen; O Frydenberg; V Simonsen
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Selection in experimental populations. II. Components of selection and their fluctuations in two populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Polivanov; W W Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The estimation of fitnesses from population data.

Authors:  T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Bundgaard; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Gene arrangements in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Configurations with tester chromosomes.

Authors:  C D Kastritsis; D W Crumpacker
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Gene arrangements in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. II. All possible configurations.

Authors:  C D Kastritsis; D W Crumpacker
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1967 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  Alloprocoptic selection: A mode of natural selection promoting polymorphism.

Authors:  J M Serradilla; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid response to perturbation of chromosome frequencies in natural populations of Drosophila robusta.

Authors:  Max Levitan; William J Etges
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Cytoplasmic incompatibility and mating preference in Colombian Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T M Jenkins; C S Babcock; D M Geiser; W W Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  V M Salceda; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Virility Deficiency and the Sex-Ratio Trait in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. I. Sperm Displacement and Sexual Selection.

Authors:  C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A Test for Rare Male Mating Advantage with DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA Karyotypes.

Authors:  W W Anderson; C J Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Effect of Inbreeding on Competitive Male-Mating Ability in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  P M Sharp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M M Brockett; H Alavi; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An adaptive chromosomal polymorphism affecting size-related traits, and longevity selection in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  F M Norry; J C Vilardi; J J Fanara; E Hasson; C Rodriguez
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  J G Brittnacher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.