Literature DB >> 6736984

Deliberate alteration of the visual evoked potential.

C T Tan, N M Murray, D Sawyers, T J Leonard.   

Abstract

Seven out of 12 normal subjects could deliberately produce abnormal pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) which simulated disorders of the anterior visual pathways without detection. In six the mechanism was near-point accommodation and in one eccentric fixation. If voluntary suppression of the VEPs is suspected various modifications to the recording technique may be of value. These include the use of a large check size and stimulus field and binocular stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6736984      PMCID: PMC1027830          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.47.5.518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  13 in total

1.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Asselman; D W Chadwick; D C Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways.

Authors:  A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Hennerici; D Wenzel; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Delayed pattern-evoked responses in optic neuritis in relation to visual acuity.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1973

6.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

8.  Effects of contour sharpness and check-size on visually evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  M R Harter; C T White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis: comparison of two methods for pattern reversal.

Authors:  B Y Nilsson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B R Cant; A L Hume; N A Shaw
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Vikki A McBain; Anthony G Robson; Chris R Hogg; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Yonatan Bahir; Rina Leibu; Ido Perlman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual acuity evaluated by pattern-reversal visual-evoked potential is affected by check size/visual angle.

Authors:  Xiping Chen; Qianqian Li; Xiaoqin Liu; Li Yang; Wentao Xia; Luyang Tao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.203

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.