Literature DB >> 17111152

Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials.

Vikki A McBain1, Anthony G Robson, Chris R Hogg, Graham E Holder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to validate the use of the short duration pattern onset visual evoked potential (PappVEP) in the objective assessment of visual acuity (VA) in patients referred with presumed non-organic visual loss.
METHODS: The combination of minimum check size and minimum contrast required to elicit a consistently discernible PappVEP (amplitude >or=5 microV) were measured in ten normal subjects under conditions of induced optical blur (0 to +3 dioptres) and the relationship to Snellen VA established. The data from 100 consecutive patients (167 eyes) referred for possible non-organic visual loss (NOVL) and 20 patients with confirmed visual pathway dysfunction were reviewed in relation to the results in normal subjects.
RESULTS: Snellen VA, under conditions of blur, could be predicted in normal subjects from the check size and contrast required to elicit a criterion PappVEP. These data were tabulated and a quantitative guideline established for the estimation of VA in the patients referred with suspected NOVL. Most (88%) patients referred with suspected NOVL had normal electrophysiology and PappVEPs consistent with normal Snellen VA. In others, they suggested a degree of non-organic overlay. In 20 cases of organic visual loss, PappVEPs were in close agreement with subjective VA.
CONCLUSIONS: The short duration pattern onset visual-evoked potential is confirmed as a clinically useful tool in the objective assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17111152     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0431-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  33 in total

1.  Standard for pattern electroretinography. International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.

Authors:  M Bach; M Hawlina; G E Holder; M F Marmor; T Meigen; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern reversal evoked potentials: gender differences and age-related changes in amplitude and latency.

Authors:  R Emmerson-Hanover; D E Shearer; D J Creel; R E Dustman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03

3.  Miniature fiber-optic pattern-reversal stimulator for determination of the visual evoked potential threshold; comparison with Snellen acuity.

Authors:  Y Raniel; H Pratt; E Neumann; S E Schacham
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The pattern visual evoked response in the assessment of visual acuity.

Authors:  G B Arden; D R Lewis
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1973

5.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Voluntary alteration of pattern visual evoked responses.

Authors:  R K Morgan; B Nugent; J M Harrison; P S O'Connor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Pattern reversal visually evoked potentials in infants.

Authors:  S Sokol; V Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-01

8.  Comparison of Snellen acuity, VER acuity, and Arden grating scores in macular and optic nerve diseases.

Authors:  H W Skalka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Visual function of the extrageniculo-calcarine system in man: relationship to cortical blindness.

Authors:  G G Celesia; C R Archer; Y Kuroiwa; P R Goldfader
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1980-11

Review 10.  From immature to mature pattern ERG and VEP.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  14 in total

1.  Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern visual evoked potentials for identifying malingering.

Authors:  I-Ting Sun; Jong-Jer Lee; Hsiu-Mei Huang; Hsi-Kung Kuo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Yunyun Wang; Chengcheng Han; Chenghang Du; Wenqaing Yan; Sicong Zhang; Renghao Liang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.

Authors:  Anne Kurtenbach; Hana Langrová; Andre Messias; Eberhart Zrenner; Herbert Jägle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.

Authors:  Yaroslava Wenner; Sven P Heinrich; Christina Beisse; Antje Fuchs; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Faces are more attractive than motion: evidence from two simultaneous oddball paradigms.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Celia M Bock; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael S Bradnam; Gordon N Dutton; Anna L Lai Chooi Yan; Tim E Lavy; I Livingstone; Alison M Mackay; Jane R Mackinnon
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Prosthodontic management of an albinism patient-dental implications and management.

Authors:  Varsha Murthy; Yuvraj V; Shaji Thomas; Preeti Nair
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-22

Review 10.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.