Literature DB >> 81751

Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis.

B R Cant, A L Hume, N A Shaw.   

Abstract

Pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) were recorded at 5 levels of luminance from 26 patients with multiple sclerosis and from age-matched normal subjects. In normal subjects, the latency of both the major positive peak (P100) and the early positive peak (P60) was an inverse logarithmic function of pattern luminance. The increase in latency per unit log decrease in luminance was 12.1 msec for P100 and 5.7 msec for P60. Only 2 patients had entirely normal results. In 9 patients, the increase in latency of P100 per unit log decrease in luminance was abnormal. Of the 18 luminance-latency functions obtained from testing both eyes, 10 were abnormal, 6 showing a greater than normal increase in latency with decreasing luminance and 4 a less than normal increase. The 6 luminance-latency functions with a greater than normal increase in latency with decreasing luminance were all from patients without other evidence of optic nerve involvement. Pattern luminance, therefore, as well as patient selection, can significantly affect the proportion of abnormal PVEP latencies in any group of patients with possible, probable or definite multiple sclerosis. The abnormal response of the PVEP to changes in luminance and the different effects upon P100 and P60 indicate that the delayed PVEPs in patients with multiple sclerosis cannot be attributed solely to slowing of conduction in the optic nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 81751     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90293-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  14 in total

1.  Photopic and scotopic VEPs in patients with congenital stationary night-blindness.

Authors:  Zuzana Kubová; Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Jana Chlubnová; Jaromir Sverák
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Comparative effects of luminance and scatter on the pattern visual evoked potential and eye-hand reaction time.

Authors:  M McKerral; P Lachapelle; J Benoit
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Evoked potential (EP) alterations in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE): early delays and latency reductions without plaques.

Authors:  D Gambi; T Fulgente; D Melchionda; M Onofrj
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1996-02

4.  Electrophysiological testing of visual function after mirror telescope implantation: a case report.

Authors:  Jan Kremláček; Naďa Jirásková; Jana Nekolová; Radovan Šikl; Miroslav Kuba
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Colored focal visual evoked potentials by cathode ray tube versus scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  F Rigaudière; J F Le Gargasson; J E Guez; Y Grall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Transient visually evoked potentials to sinusoidal gratings in optic neuritis.

Authors:  G T Plant
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques.

Authors:  M Brigell; D I Kaufman; P Bobak; A Beydoun
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Deliberate alteration of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C T Tan; N M Murray; D Sawyers; T J Leonard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Reproducibility of the visual evoked potential using a light-emitting diode stimulator.

Authors:  N F Skuse; D Burke; B McKeon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of MS.

Authors:  H C Diener; W Koch; J Dichgans
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.