Literature DB >> 2261737

Comparison between radial bone mineral density measured by single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometric bone mass parameters measured on iliac crest biopsies.

F Duboeuf1, D Uebelhart, G Boivin, C Edouard, P D Delmas, P J Meunier.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by single photon absorptiometry (SPA) with a Moolsgard 1100 device on the distal and proximal part of the radius was compared with histomorphometric parameters measured on iliac crest biopsies in 37 patients suffering from various bone disorders. In the whole population, a good correlation was observed between the cancellous bone volume (Cn-BV/TV) measured on iliac crest biopsies and BMD from both the proximal part of the radius (r = 0.76, p less than 0.001) and the distal part of the radius (r = 0.73, p less than 0.001). Significant, although weaker correlations, were also found between the cortical width and the BMD from the distal part (r = 0.37, p less than 0.001) and the proximal part (r = 0.44, p less than 0.001) of the radius. In the 14 untreated osteoporotic patients, only a significant Spearman correlation was observed between the iliac Cn-BV/TV and the proximal radial BMD (r' = 0.69, p less than 0.05). It is thus not clear, whether radial proximal BMD correctly indicates cortical bone density in osteoporotic patients or not. The large internal variability of each of the two investigated methods and the small group of osteoporotic patients might explain the lack of correlation between the two methods in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2261737     DOI: 10.1007/bf02114398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  24 in total

1.  Thickness of the cortical layer as an estimate of mineral content of human finger bones.

Authors:  P VIRTAMA; H MAHONEN
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Proceedings: Percentages of cortical and trabecular bone mineral mass in the radius and ulna.

Authors:  R A Schlenker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Borg; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  [Comparison of radiodensitometry and histomorphometry in normal and abnormal bone (author's transl)].

Authors:  A M Laval-Jeantet; J Y Chateau; C Bergot; M Laval-Jeantet; D Kuntz
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1981-03

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Comparison of bone mass measured by histomorphometry on iliac biopsy and by dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  P D Delmas; E Fontanges; F Duboeuf; G Boivin; P Chavassieux; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl; B G Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone density in osteopenic women: a modified distal radius density measurement procedure to develop an "at risk" value for use in screening women.

Authors:  S A Grubb; P C Jacobson; B J Awbrey; W H McCartney; L M Vincent; R V Talmage
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.