Literature DB >> 2759128

The reproducibility of single photon absorptiometry in a clinical setting.

R Valkema1, J A Blokland, S E Papapoulos, O L Bijvoet, E K Pauwels.   

Abstract

The reproducibility of single photon absorptiometry (SPA) results for detection of changes in bone mineral content (BMC) was evaluated in a clinical setting. During a period of 18 months with 4 different sources, the calibration scans of an aluminium standard had a variation of less than 1% unless the activity of the 125I source was low. The calibration procedure was performed weekly and this was sufficient to correct for drift of the system. The short term reproducibility in patients was assessed with 119 duplicate measurements made in direct succession. The best reproducibility (CV = 1.35%) was found for fat corrected BMC results expressed in g/cm, obtained at the site proximal to the 8 mm space between the radius and ulna. Analysis of all SPA scans made during 1 year (487 scans) showed a failure of the automatic procedure to detect the space of 8 mm between the forearm bones in 19 scans (3.9%). A space adjacent to the ulnar styloid was taken as the site for the first scan in these examinations. This problem may be recognized and corrected relatively easy. A significant correlation was found between BMC of the lower arm and BMC of the lumbar spine assessed with dual photon absorptiometry. However, the error of estimation of proximal BMC (SEE = 20.0%) and distal BMC (SEE = 19.4%) made these measurements of little value to predict BMC at the lumbar spine in individuals. The short term reproducibility in patients combined with the long term stability of the equipment in our clinical setting showed that SPA is a reliable technique to assess changes in bone mass at the lower arm of 4% between 2 measurements with a confidence level of 95%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2759128     DOI: 10.1007/BF00257547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  14 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in bone mass after one year as measured by different techniques in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  S M Ott; R F Kilcoyne; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Errors in longitudinal measurements of bone mineral: effect of source strength in single and dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  W L Dunn; S H Kan; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Borg; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Assessment of bone mineral. Part 2.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Rates of bone loss in the appendicular and axial skeletons of women. Evidence of substantial vertebral bone loss before menopause.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; L J Melton; L S Richelson; H L Judd; K P Offord
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.