Literature DB >> 66132

Identification and separation of acoustic frequency following responses (FFRS) in man.

H Sohmer, H Pratt.   

Abstract

Frequency following responses (FFRs) to monaural tone bursts were recorded in normal and hearing impaired subjects as the potential difference between an ipsilateral earlobe electrode and a scalp vertex electrode. Whenn the rubber tube coupler between the earphone and the subject's ear was clamped, a stimulus artefact FFR was occasionally recorded. The "biological" FFR had a latency of about 1 msec and an irregular wave form which was made more sinusoidal by the addition of white noise. When the responses to tone bursts of opposite onset phases were added together, a "double frequency" FFR was obtained which had a latency of about 6 msec and whose amplitude was appreciably reduced by white noise. In some hearing impaired subjects (with no neural responses to clicks), this longer latency double frequency component could not be recorded, while in those cases in which the cochlear microphonic potential could be recorded, the shorter latency FFR was also present. It is concluded that the FFR in normally hearing subjects is made up of a short latency cochlear microphonic component and a longer latency neural component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 66132     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90212-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  10 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An investigation of the auditory frequency-following responses as compared to cochlear potentials.

Authors:  S M Hou; D M Lipscomb
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

4.  Electrophysiological measurement of binaural beats: effects of primary tone frequency and observer age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sara Momtaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 9.  Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).

Authors:  Bhanu Shukla; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Differential Group Delay of the Frequency Following Response Measured Vertically and Horizontally.

Authors:  Andrew King; Kathryn Hopkins; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.