Literature DB >> 33497718

Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Sara Momtaz2.   

Abstract

Scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) reflect a mixture of phase-locked activity across the auditory pathway. FFRs have been widely used as a neural barometer of complex listening skills, especially speech-in noise (SIN) perception. Applying individually optimized source reconstruction to speech-FFRs recorded via EEG (FFREEG), we assessed the relative contributions of subcortical [auditory nerve (AN), brainstem/midbrain (BS)] and cortical [bilateral primary auditory cortex, PAC] source generators with the aim of identifying which source(s) drive the brain-behavior relation between FFRs and SIN listening skills. We found FFR strength declined precipitously from AN to PAC, consistent with diminishing phase-locking along the ascending auditory neuroaxis. FFRs to the speech fundamental (F0) were robust to noise across sources, but were largest in subcortical sources (BS > AN > PAC). PAC FFRs were only weakly observed above the noise floor and only at the low pitch of speech (F0≈100 Hz). Brain-behavior regressions revealed (i) AN and BS FFRs were sufficient to describe listeners' QuickSIN scores and (ii) contrary to neuromagnetic (MEG) FFRs, neither left nor right PAC FFREEG related to SIN performance. Our findings suggest subcortical sources not only dominate the electrical FFR but also the link between speech-FFRs and SIN processing in normal-hearing adults as observed in previous EEG studies.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem response (ABR); Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs); Cocktail party scenario; Cortical FFR; Noise-degraded speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33497718      PMCID: PMC7897268          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  38 in total

1.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Gabriella Musacchia; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Functional changes in inter- and intra-hemispheric cortical processing underlying degraded speech perception.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Megan Howell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists.

Authors:  Rachel A McArdle; Richard H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Identification and separation of acoustic frequency following responses (FFRS) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-04

6.  Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05

8.  Frequency-Following Responses to Complex Tones at Different Frequencies Reflect Different Source Configurations.

Authors:  Xiaochen Zhang; Qin Gong
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Sibylle C Herholz; Alexander M P Chepesiuk; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Fran López-Caballero; Pablo Martin-Trias; Teresa Ribas-Prats; Natàlia Gorina-Careta; David Bartrés-Faz; Carles Escera
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).

Authors:  Bhanu Shukla; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Relations between speech-reception, psychophysical temporal processing, and subcortical electrophysiological measures of auditory function in humans.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.