Literature DB >> 6589962

Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants.

W E Roberts, R K Smith, Y Zilberman, P G Mozsary, R S Smith.   

Abstract

Titanium implants, with an acid-etched surface, were screwed into holes 3 mm in diameter, about 1 cm apart, carefully prepared with an internally irrigated, surgical bur in the femurs of 3- to 6-month-old rabbits. During the first 3 days after surgery, fluorescent bone labels revealed extensive bone formation, particularly at the endosteal margin of the surgical defect, indicating preservation of a high degree of osteogenic capacity. A lattice of coarse, woven bone began encapsulating the implant within 3 days. By the end of 6 weeks, mature, lamellar bone filled voids at or near the implant surface and a rigid bone/implant interface was routinely achieved. Nonspecific, subperiosteal bony hypertrophy was noted within 6 weeks after implants were placed in young, growing animals (3 months old), but not in adults (6 months old). After 6 to 12 weeks of healing, a 100-gm load was applied for 4 to 8 weeks by stretching a stainless steel spring between the implants. All but one of twenty loaded implants remained rigid. Immediate loading of four pairs of implants resulted in spontaneous spiral-type ("torsional") fractures of the femur within 1 week. These results indicate that (1) relatively simple and inexpensive titanium implants develop a rigid osseous interface, (2) 6 weeks is an adequate healing period, prior to loading, to attain rigid stability and avoid spontaneous fracture, (3) continuously loaded implants remain stable within the bone, (4) bone formation is observed on periosteal surfaces subjected to concave flexure (compression), (5) cancellous-type bone orients perpendicularly between loaded implants, apparently corresponding to lines of stress, (6) new secondary osteons are propagated at or near the surface of loaded implants, (7) the remodeling (turnover) cycle for rabbit compact bone is about 6 weeks, and (8) endosseous implants have potential as a source of firm osseous anchorage for orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6589962     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  46 in total

1.  Osteodynamics around orthodontically loaded short maxillary implants. An experimental pilot study.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; M Yildirim; P Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Electron microscopic investigation on the osteogenesis at titanium implant/bone marrow interface under masticatory loading.

Authors:  H Kawahara; S Nakakita; M Ito; K Niwa; D Kawahara; S Matsuda
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The Orthosystem--a new implant system for orthodontic anchorage in the palate.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; J Glatzmaier; U Mundwiller; P Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Histomorphometric evaluation of the effects of various diode lasers and force levels on orthodontic mini screw stability.

Authors:  Merve Goymen; Eren Isman; Lale Taner; Mehmet Kurkcu
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  In vivo degradation of orthodontic miniscrew implants: surface analysis of as-received and retrieved specimens.

Authors:  Masahiro Iijima; Takeshi Muguruma; Masahiro Kawaguchi; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Skeletal anchorage for everybody? a questionnaire study on frequency of use and clinical indications in daily practice.

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of a new implant design supporting immediately loaded full arch rehabilitation.

Authors:  Stefano Tetè; Vincenzo Zizzari; Alessandro De Carlo; Bruna Sinjari; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-08-09

8.  Accuracy of torque-limiting devices used for mini-implant placement--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander Pauls; Manuel Nienkemper; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Accuracy of torque-limiting devices for mini-implant removal: an in vitro study.

Authors:  A Pauls; M Nienkemper; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 10.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.