Literature DB >> 24604993

Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan1, Norsiah Binti Yunus2.   

Abstract

One of the considerable challenges for screw-retained multi-unit implant prosthesis is achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis' superstructure to the implants. This passive fit is supposed to be one of the most vital requirements for the maintenance of the osseointegration. On the other hand, the misfit of the implant supported superstructure may lead to unfavourable complications, which can be mechanical or biological in nature. The manifestations of these complications may range from fracture of various components in the implant system, pain, marginal bone loss, and even loss of osseointegration. Thus, minimizing the misfit and optimizing the passive fit should be a prerequisite for implant survival and success. The purpose of this article is to present and summarize some aspects of the passive fit achieving and improving methods. The literature review was performed through Science Direct, Pubmed, and Google database. They were searched in English using the following combinations of keywords: passive fit, implant misfit and framework misfit. Articles were selected on the basis of whether they had sufficient information related to framework misfit's related factors, passive fit and its achievement techniques, marginal bone changes relation with the misfit, implant impression techniques and splinting concept. The related references were selected in order to emphasize the importance of the passive fit achievement and the misfit minimizing. Despite the fact that the literature presents considerable information regarding the framework's misfit, there was not consistency in literature on a specified number or even a range to be the acceptable level of misfit. On the other hand, a review of the literature revealed that the complete passive fit still remains a tricky goal to be achieved by the prosthodontist.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant; Misfit; Passive fit; Splinting

Year:  2013        PMID: 24604993      PMCID: PMC3935037          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0343-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  45 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A G Wee; S A Aquilino; R L Schneider
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures.

Authors:  D Herbst; J C Nel; C H Driessen; P J Becker
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.

Authors:  A P Randi; A T Hsu; A Verga; J J Kim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.

Authors:  Marcos M Naconecy; Eduardo R Teixeira; Rosemary S A Shinkai; Luis Carlos F Frasca; André Cervieri
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins.

Authors:  P Mojon; J P Oberholzer; J M Meyer; U C Belser
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.

Authors:  Nayereh Rashidan; Marzieh Alikhasi; Samad Samadizadeh; Elahe Beyabanaki; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.932

7.  Tolerance measurements of various implant components.

Authors:  T Ma; J I Nicholls; J E Rubenstein
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures.

Authors:  I J Klineberg; G M Murray
Journal:  Swed Dent J Suppl       Date:  1985

9.  A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques.

Authors:  C C Hsu; P L Millstein; R S Stein
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 10.  The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heeje Lee; Joseph S So; J L Hochstedler; Carlo Ercoli
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  19 in total

1.  Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.

Authors:  Maria Menini; Paolo Setti; Francesco Pera; Paolo Pera; Paolo Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  [Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].

Authors:  Shan Song; Zheng Zheng; Li-Yuan Yang; Xu Gao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible.

Authors:  Firas-Abdulameer Farhan; Ali-Jameel-Abdul Sahib; Abdalbseet-Ahmad Fatalla
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

4.  Effect of Polyvinyl Siloxane Viscosity on Accuracy of Dental Implant Impressions.

Authors:  Ahmad Ghahremanloo; Mahdieh Seifi; Jalil Ghanbarzade; Seyyed Mohammad Abrisham; Rashid Abdolah Javan
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01

5.  Effect of technique and impression material on the vertical misfit of a screw-retained, three-unit implant bridge: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Rajati Haghi; Masoud Shiehzadeh; Mohammadreza Nakhaei; Fatemeh Ahrary; Saeid Sabzevari
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An in vitro study comparing accuracy of custom trays versus specialized aluminum stock tray.

Authors:  Mukti Goel; Pankaj Dhawan; Piyush Tandan; Pankaj Madhukar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

7.  Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paolo Cappare; Gianpaolo Sannino; Margherita Minoli; Pietro Montemezzi; Francesco Ferrini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review.

Authors:  Minoru Sanda; Keita Miyoshi; Kazuyoshi Baba
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-27

9.  Rehabilitation of a maxillary partial edentulous patient using an implant-supported overdenture retained with two bilateral milled bars.

Authors:  Atif Mohammed Almadani; Fabian Huettig
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-24

10.  Comparative evaluation of the effect of impression materials and trays on the accuracy of angulated implants impressions.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Zeinab Saeidi; Marzieh Alikhasi; Somayeh Zeighami
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.