Literature DB >> 23087785

Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of a new implant design supporting immediately loaded full arch rehabilitation.

Stefano Tetè1, Vincenzo Zizzari, Alessandro De Carlo, Bruna Sinjari, Enrico Gherlone.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate macroscopic and microscopic appearance of a new implant design, with particular emphasis given to the type of prosthesis connection. Two dental implants of the same type (Torque Type(®), WinSix(®), BioSAFin. S.r.l. - Ancona, Italy), with sandblasted and acid etched surfaces (Micro Rough Surface(®)), but differing from each other for the prosthesis connection system, were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis at different magnifications: TTI implant, with a hexagonal internal connection, and TTX implant, with a hexagonal external connection. SEM analysis showed that the Torque Type(®) implant is characterized by a truncated cone shape with tapered tips. The implant body showed a double loop thread and double pitch with blunt tips. For both types of connection, the implant neck was 0.7 mm in height with a 3% taper. This implant design may be able to guarantee osteotomic properties at the time of insertion in a surgical site suitably prepared, a facilitated screwing, thanks to the thread pitch and to the broad and deep draining grooves, thereby ensuring a good primary stability. The different connection design appears defined and precise, in order to ensure a good interface between the fixture and the prosthetic components. Therefore, this design appears to be particularly suitable in cases where a good primary stability is necessary and a precise coupling between endosseous and prosthetic components, as it allows an easy insertion of the fixture even in conditions of reduced bone availability, and in cases of immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM); dental implant; implant connection

Year:  2012        PMID: 23087785      PMCID: PMC3476494     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)        ISSN: 1824-0852


  42 in total

Review 1.  Implant design considerations for the posterior regions of the mouth.

Authors:  C E Misch
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 2.  Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Murillo Sucena Pita; Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta; Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão; Idelmo Rangel Garcia; Vinicius Pedrazzi; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Changes in abutment screw dimensions after off-axis loading of implant-supported crowns: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gregory Lavrentiadis; Hoda Yousef; Allyn Luke; Robert Flinton
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.454

4.  Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis.

Authors:  Dincer Bozkaya; Sinan Muftu; Ali Muftu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces.

Authors:  Sauro Grassi; Adriano Piattelli; Luciene Cristina de Figueiredo; Magda Feres; Leandro de Melo; Giovanna Iezzi; Rodolfo Candia Alba; Jamil Awad Shibli
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; R K Schenk; S Steinemann; J P Fiorellini; C H Fox; H Stich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-07

7.  A macro- and nanostructure evaluation of a novel dental implant.

Authors:  Stefano Tetè; Filiberto Mastrangelo; Tonino Traini; Raffaele Vinci; Gilberto Sammartino; Gaetano Marenzi; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 8.  Hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants. Biologic rationale and surgical technique.

Authors:  J T Krauser
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1989-10

9.  Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity.

Authors:  S Lossdörfer; Z Schwartz; L Wang; C H Lohmann; J D Turner; M Wieland; D L Cochran; B D Boyan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants.

Authors:  W E Roberts; R K Smith; Y Zilberman; P G Mozsary; R S Smith
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.