Literature DB >> 6525935

The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.

J M Wild, J G Flanagan, D A Barnes, B A Gilmartin, P A Good, S J Crews.   

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of the Octopus automated perimeter (Programmes 21 and 31), the Goldmann Bowl perimeter, the Bjerrum Screen and the Friedmann VFAs MkI and MkII was carried out on a heterogeneous sample of 75 patients. The results for the sample as a whole were analysed statistically in terms of the scoring system developed by Flanagan, Wild, Barnes, Gilmartin, Good and Crews (1984a). Statistically significant differences between the instruments were found at each of the 4 levels of analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6525935     DOI： 10.1007/bf00679797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  12 in total

1.  Computerized perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  J A McCrary; J Feigon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Static perimetry: strategies.

Authors:  H Bebie; F Fankhauser; J Spahr
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1976-07

3.  Visual field analyser and threshold.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: III. Clinical analysis.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: I. Scoring system.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Computerized profile perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Heijl; S M Drance
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-12

7.  Automatic (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  U Schmied
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1980

8.  [Automatic perimeter "Octopus" (according to Fankhauser). A clinical comparison with the visual field device of Goldmann (author's transl)].

Authors:  A Kampik; O E Lund; J H Greite
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases.

Authors:  S G Li; G L Spaeth; H A Scimeca; N J Schatz; P J Savino
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Serial analysis of changes in visual field defects, employing a new instrument, to determine the activity of diseases involving the visual pathways.

Authors:  A I Friedmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 3.250
View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of annual dosing with ivermectin on progression of onchocercal visual field loss.

Authors:  S N Cousens; A Cassels-Brown; I Murdoch; O E Babalola; D Jatau; N D Alexander; J E Evans; P Danboyi; A Abiose; B R Jones
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  The interpretation of the differential threshold in the central visual field.

Authors:  J M Wild; J M Wood; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: III. Clinical analysis.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Manipulation of sensitivity in visual field investigation.

Authors:  D A Barnes; J M Wild; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.