Literature DB >> 233862

Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases.

S G Li1, G L Spaeth, H A Scimeca, N J Schatz, P J Savino.   

Abstract

This is a study of 59 patients, 42 with glaucoma and 17 with neurological disease, to compare the Octopus automated perimeter with the conventional Goldmann and Tubinger perimeters for detection and assessment of visual field defects. We believe the Octopus automated perimeter is an excellent method for screening patients suspected of glaucoma and can be expected to identify over 90% of the patients actually having visual field loss due to glaucoma. In patients with neurological disease, the Goldmann perimeter was superior to either the Octopus or Tubinger perimeters in providing clinically useful information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 233862     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35397-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

1.  Full threshold versus quantification of defects for visual field testing in glaucoma.

Authors:  W C Stewart; M B Shields; A R Ollie
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

Authors:  John Landers; Alok Sharma; Ivan Goldberg; Stuart Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.

Authors:  J M Wild; J G Flanagan; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Analytic approaches to the interpretation of automated threshold perimetric data for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; C Duggan; C Auer; H Abbey
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1985

5.  Changes of glaucomatous field defects. Degree of accuracy of measurements with the automatic perimeter Octopus.

Authors:  B Gloor; U Schmied; A Faessler
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Programmed visual field testing.

Authors:  D R Anderson
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1982

7.  Pituitary adenomas: automatic static perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. A comparative study of 345 visual field charts.

Authors:  M Grochowicki; A Vighetto; S Berquet; Y Khalfallah; G Sassolas
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Performance of computer assisted perimeters.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.