Literature DB >> 233861

Computerized perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology.

J A McCrary1, J Feigon.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1979        PMID： 233861     DOI： 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35398-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN： 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters.

Authors:  J Landers; A Sharma; I Goldberg; S Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: I. Scoring system.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.

Authors:  J M Wild; J G Flanagan; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Variability of the hill of vision and its significance in automated perimetry.

Authors:  N A Jacobs; I H Patterson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Programmed visual field testing.

Authors:  D R Anderson
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1982

6.  Pituitary adenomas: automatic static perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. A comparative study of 345 visual field charts.

Authors:  M Grochowicki; A Vighetto; S Berquet; Y Khalfallah; G Sassolas
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry.

Authors:  L N Johnson; F G Baloh
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.798
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.