Literature DB >> 988949

Static perimetry: strategies.

H Bebie, F Fankhauser, J Spahr.   

Abstract

In static perimetry the method of limits is widely used for threshold determinations. Its performance is compared with that of a certain modification of the staircase method (repetitive up and down) by means of simulations, where the behaviour of the observer is described by an assumed psychometric function. Systematic and random errors are considerably smaller with the up and down method. Further consideration is given to signal detection theory and to the concept of optimal strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 988949     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1976.tb01262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  17 in total

1.  Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  P G D Spry; C A Johnson; A M McKendrick; A Turpin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Characteristics of the normal central visual field measured with resolution perimetry.

Authors:  P House; M Schulzer; S Drance; G Douglas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy.

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; T Fendrich; M Becker; H Krastel; F E Kruse; H E Völcker
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The concept of visual field indices.

Authors:  J Flammer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Optimal test parameters for computerized quantitative layer-by-layer perimetry.

Authors:  T Bek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus Program G1. I. Differential light sensitivity at individual test locations.

Authors:  M Zulauf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus-Program G1. II. Global visual field indices.

Authors:  M Zulauf; R P LeBlanc; J Flammer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.

Authors:  J M Wild; J G Flanagan; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Computer-assisted perimetry in visual pathway disease: neuro-ophthalmic applications.

Authors:  B R Younge
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1984

10.  Performance of computer assisted perimeters.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.