Literature DB >> 6525934

The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: I. Scoring system.

J G Flanagan, J M Wild, D A Barnes, B A Gilmartin, P A Good, S J Crews.   

Abstract

Previous methods for the qualitative evaluation of visual field instruments are subject to certain limitations. A system is proposed to overcome these deficiencies. It has been developed from experiences of a clinical study involving 5 different visual field instruments. The method uses 4 levels of analysis and permits separate appraisals of diagnostic potential and detailed inter-instrument comparative evaluation.

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6525934     DOI： 10.1007/bf00679796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  8 in total

1.  An automatic perimeter for glaucoma visual field screening and control. Construction and clinical cases.

Authors:  A Heijl; C E Krakau
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-10-17

2.  Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser.

Authors:  F Feldman
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Computerized perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  J A McCrary; J Feigon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Suprathreshold static perimetry. Initial clinical trials with the Fieldmaster automated perimeter.

Authors:  J L Keltner; C A Johnson; F G Balestrery
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-02

5.  Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.

Authors:  S Schindler; J A McCrary
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-06

6.  Sampling systems for visual field assessment and computerised perimetry.

Authors:  N Drasdo; W C Peaston
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Performance of computer assisted perimeters.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.

Authors:  A Heijl; S M Drance
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-05
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Stimulus investigative range in the perimetry of retinitis pigmentosa: some preliminary findings.

Authors:  J M Wood; J M Wild; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-09-30       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: III. Clinical analysis.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.

Authors:  J M Wild; J G Flanagan; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?

Authors:  Miriam L Conway; Sarah L Hosking; Haogang Zhu; Robert P Cubbidge
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.209
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.