Literature DB >> 6501701

Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves.

B C Moore, B R Glasberg, B Roberts.   

Abstract

Four experiments were performed in an attempt to refine the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs). PTCs were determined using sinusoidal signals and narrow-band noise maskers, in both simultaneous and forward masking. In experiment I a fixed low-level notched noise was gated with the masker in order to restrict off-frequency listening and to eliminate "confusions" between the signal and masker in forward masking. In contrast to previous work, this procedure produced PTCs with similar round tips in both simultaneous and forward masking. The PTCs differed mainly in that the high-frequency skirts were steeper in forward masking. Experiment II compared PTCs with and without an additional notched-noise masker, for a number of signal levels. The notched noise had the effect of broadening the tips of the PTCs, this effect being greater in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. With increasing signal level the high-frequency skirt of the PTC became slightly steeper, and the low-frequency skirt slightly shallower. Experiment III studied the effect of signal duration on PTCs determined in simultaneous masking. Duration had little effect when off-frequency listening was restricted with a fixed notched-noise masker, but had a substantial effect in the absence of such a masker. Experiment IV studied the effect of signal delay in forward masking. When off-frequency listening was restricted and the signal levels adjusted to produce similar masker levels at threshold for each delay, the shape of the PTC was not affected by delay. It is concluded that, when PTCs are determined in the presence of notched noise, suppression is probably responsible for most of the differences between simultaneous and forward masking. Previous work may have overestimated the influence of suppression, because it did not control off-frequency listening and/or provide appropriate detection cues in forward masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6501701     DOI: 10.1121/1.391425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

4.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.