Literature DB >> 23363112

Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.

Yi-Wen Liu1, Stephen T Neely.   

Abstract

This paper presents the results of simulating the acoustic suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) from a computer model of cochlear mechanics. A tone suppressor was introduced, causing the DPOAE level to decrease, and the decrement was plotted against an increasing suppressor level. Suppression threshold was estimated from the resulting suppression growth functions (SGFs), and suppression tuning curves (STCs) were obtained by plotting the suppression threshold as a function of suppressor frequency. Results show that the slope of SGFs is generally higher for low-frequency suppressors than high-frequency suppressors, resembling those obtained from normal hearing human ears. By comparing responses of normal (100%) vs reduced (50%) outer-hair-cell sensitivities, the model predicts that the tip-to-tail difference of the STCs correlates well with that of intra-cochlear iso-displacement tuning curves. The correlation is poorer, however, between the sharpness of the STCs and that of the intra-cochlear tuning curves. These results agree qualitatively with what was recently reported from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human subjects, and examination of intra-cochlear model responses can provide the needed insight regarding the interpretation of DPOAE STCs obtained in individual ears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363112      PMCID: PMC3574077          DOI: 10.1121/1.4774279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1976

4.  Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; B Roberts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-level pure-tone masking: a comparison of "tuning curves" obtained with simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  L L Vogten
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity.

Authors:  S T Neely; D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man.

Authors:  A M Brown; D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures.

Authors:  G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin; R Probst; S A Scheinin; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.