Literature DB >> 6491610

Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects.

A A Wright, H C Santiago, S F Sands.   

Abstract

Three rhesus monkeys were trained and tested in a same/different task with six successive sets of 70 item pairs to an 88% accuracy on each set. Their poor initial transfer performance (55% correct) with novel stimuli improved dramatically to 85% correct following daily item changes in the training stimuli. They acquired a serial-probe-recognition (SPR) task with variable (1-6) item list lengths. This SPR acquisition, although gradual, was more rapid for the monkeys than for pigeons similarly trained. Testing with a fixed list length of four items at different delays between the last list item and the probe test item revealed changes in the serial-position function: a recency effect (last items remembered well) for 0-s delay, recency and primacy effects (first and last list items remembered well) for 1-, 2-, and 10-s delays, and only a primacy effect for the longest 30-s delay. These results are compared with similar ones from pigeons and are discussed in relation to theories of memory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6491610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  18 in total

1.  Concept learning by monkeys with video picture images and a touch screen.

Authors:  R S Bhatt; A A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task.

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; Anthony A Wright; Jacquelyne J Rivera; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Relational and absolute stimulus learning by monkeys in a memory task.

Authors:  A A Wright; R G Cook; D F Kendrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: Relational matching and working memory.

Authors:  J David Smith; Brooke N Jackson; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

7.  The representative animal.

Authors:  J M Harrison
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994

8.  Rhesus monkeys lack a consistent peak-end effect.

Authors:  Eric R Xu; Emily J Knight; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Monkey auditory list memory: tests with mixed and blocked retention delays.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.