Literature DB >> 19380897

Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task.

L Caitlin Elmore1, Anthony A Wright, Jacquelyne J Rivera, Jeffrey S Katz.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were trained in a three-item simultaneous same/different task. Three of six stimulus combinations were not trained (untrained set) and were tested later. Following acquisition, the subjects were tested with novel stimuli, the untrained set, training-stimulus inversions, and object shape and color manipulations. There was no novel-stimulus transfer--that is, no abstract-concept learning. Two pigeons showed partial transfer to untrained pairs and good transfer to stimulus inversions, suggesting that they had learned the relationship between the stimuli. Lack of transfer by the third pigeon suggests item-specific learning. The somewhat surprising finding of relational learning by 2 pigeons with only six training pairs suggests restricted-domain relational learning that was controlled more by color than by shape features. Individual differences of item-specific learning by 1 pigeon and relational learning by 2 others demonstrate that this task can be learned in different ways and that relational learning can occur in the absence of novel-stimulus transfer.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380897     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.2.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  15 in total

1.  Judgment of conceptual identity in monkeys.

Authors:  D Bovet; J Vauclair
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  D L Oden; R K Thompson; D Premack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-04

3.  Concept learning by monkeys with video picture images and a touch screen.

Authors:  R S Bhatt; A A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

7.  Grouping of artificial objects in pigeons: an inquiry into the cognitive architecture of an avian mind.

Authors:  Janina A Kirsch; Anna Kabanova; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Shaun P Vecera; Jonathan Levin; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jacquelyne J Rivera; Jeffrey S Katz; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-07

10.  A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts.

Authors:  Leonidas A A Doumas; John E Hummel; Catherine M Sandhofer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  6 in total

1.  Testing the translational-symmetry hypothesis of abstract-concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  A case for restricted-domain relational learning.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

3.  Change detection by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; John F Magnotti; Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Domain is a moving target for relational learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Functional relationships for investigating cognitive processes.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Same/different concept learning by capuchin monkeys in matching-to-sample tasks.

Authors:  Valentina Truppa; Eva Piano Mortari; Duilio Garofoli; Sara Privitera; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.