Literature DB >> 2584915

Relational and absolute stimulus learning by monkeys in a memory task.

A A Wright1, R G Cook, D F Kendrick.   

Abstract

Three experiments showed stimulus control by either the absolute properties of probe stimuli, relational properties of the probe-list relationship, or both in a serial probe recognition memory task in which a four-item memory list was followed by a single probe (test) item. In Experiment 1, 3 rhesus monkeys received 39 to 75 repetitions of the same 24-trial stimulus sequence. Special tests showed stimulus control by the absolute properties of the probe stimuli. Retention of previous relational control was demonstrated by the good transfer (83%) to novel list and probe stimuli at the beginning of Experiment 2. During Experiment 2, control by absolute properties of the probe stimuli gradually reoccurred. Only a small measure of control by list stimuli could be detected or promoted. In Experiment 3, 4 monkeys were shown to have largely lost their ability to perform on the basis of the list-probe relationship, and were performing primarily on the basis of the absolute properties of the probe stimuli. Over the next 15 weeks, these monkeys were transferred to new stimuli at the beginning of each week. Control by the relational aspects of the task gradually returned. As transfer performance increased, control by the absolute properties of the probe stimuli was eliminated. The results are discussed in terms of stimulus control and performance strategies used by the monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584915      PMCID: PMC1339178          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  31 in total

1.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W W CUMMING; R BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1988-03

5.  Long-term proactive interference and novelty enhancement effect in monkey list memory.

Authors:  M Jitsumori; A A Wright; R G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-04

6.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.

Authors:  A A Wright; H C Santiago; S F Sands; D F Kendrick; R G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity.

Authors:  R Berryman; W W Cumming; L R Cohen; D F Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-12

8.  Primate memory: retention of serial list items by a rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S F Sands; A A Wright
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Flexible memory processing by rats: use of prospective and retrospective information in the radial maze.

Authors:  R G Cook; M F Brown; D A Riley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-07

10.  Serial position and clustering effects in a chimpanzee's "free recall".

Authors:  J P Buchanan; T V Gill; J T Braggio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Time-course of control by specific stimulus features and relational cues during same-different discrimination training.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: the merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes.

Authors:  L Fields; K F Reeve; B J Adams; J L Brown; T Verhave
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: Relational matching and working memory.

Authors:  J David Smith; Brooke N Jackson; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

4.  Fading perceptual resemblance: a path for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to conceptual matching?

Authors:  J David Smith; Timothy M Flemming; Joseph Boomer; Michael J Beran; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.