Literature DB >> 25245498

Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

James B Dewey1, Jungmee Lee, Sumitrajit Dhar.   

Abstract

Medial olivocochlear (MOC) influence on cochlear mechanics can be noninvasively, albeit indirectly, explored via the effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) on otoacoustic emissions. CAS-mediated effects are particularly pronounced for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), which are typically reduced in amplitude and shifted upward in frequency by CAS. We investigated whether similar frequency shifts and magnitude reductions were observed behaviorally in the fine structure of pure-tone hearing thresholds, a phenomenon thought to share a common underlying mechanism with SOAEs. In normal-hearing listeners, fine-resolution thresholds were obtained over a narrow frequency range centered on the frequency of an SOAE, both in the absence and presence of 60-dB SPL broadband CAS. While CAS shifted threshold fine structure patterns and SOAEs upward in frequency by a comparable amount, little reduction in the presence or depth of fine structure was observed at frequencies near those of SOAEs. In fact, CAS typically improved thresholds, particularly at threshold minima, and increased fine structure depth when reductions in the amplitude of the associated SOAE were less than 10 dB. Additional measurements made at frequencies distant from SOAEs, or near SOAEs that were more dramatically reduced in amplitude by the CAS, revealed that CAS tended to elevate thresholds and reduce threshold fine structure depth. The results suggest that threshold fine structure is sensitive to MOC-mediated changes in cochlear gain, but that SOAEs complicate the interpretation of threshold measurements at nearby frequencies, perhaps due to masking or other interference effects. Both threshold fine structure and SOAEs may be significant sources of intersubject and intrasubject variability in psychoacoustic investigations of MOC function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245498      PMCID: PMC4389962          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0485-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  85 in total

1.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

2.  Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat.

Authors:  M L Wiederhold; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D C Mountain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

7.  Spontaneous narrowband acoustic signals emitted by human ears.

Authors:  P M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus.

Authors:  J P Wilson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Physiologically active cochlear micromechanics--one source of tinnitus.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1981

Review 10.  Acoustic correlates of tonal tinnitus.

Authors:  J P Wilson; G J Sutton
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1981
View more
  4 in total

1.  Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.

Authors:  James D Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-13

2.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; James B Dewey; Sriram Boothalingam; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-10

4.  Olivocochlear efferent function: issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.