Literature DB >> 33389676

Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Elan Selvi Anandan1, Ruby Husain1, Kumar Seluakumaran2.   

Abstract

Signals containing attended frequencies are facilitated while those with unexpected frequencies are suppressed by an auditory filtering process. The neurocognitive mechanism underlying the auditory attentional filter is, however, poorly understood. The olivocochlear bundle (OCB), a brainstem neural circuit that is part of the efferent system, has been suggested to be partly responsible for the filtering via its noise-dependent antimasking effect. The current study examined the role of the OCB in attentional filtering, particularly the validity of the antimasking hypothesis, by comparing attentional filters measured in quiet and in the presence of background noise in a group of normal-hearing listeners. Filters obtained in both conditions were comparable, suggesting that the presence of background noise is not crucial for attentional filter generation. In addition, comparison of frequency-specific changes of the cue-evoked enhancement component of filters in quiet and noise also did not reveal any major contribution of background noise to the cue effect. These findings argue against the involvement of an antimasking effect in the attentional process. Instead of the antimasking effect mediated via medial olivocochlear fibers, results from current and earlier studies can be explained by frequency-specific modulation of afferent spontaneous activity by lateral olivocochlear fibers. It is proposed that the activity of these lateral fibers could be driven by top-down cortical control via a noise-independent mechanism. SIGNIFICANCE: The neural basis for auditory attentional filter remains a fundamental but poorly understood area in auditory neuroscience. The efferent olivocochlear pathway that projects from the brainstem back to the cochlea has been suggested to mediate the attentional effect via its noise-dependent antimasking effect. The current study demonstrates that the filter generation is mostly independent of the background noise, and therefore is unlikely to be mediated by the olivocochlear brainstem reflex. It is proposed that the entire cortico-olivocochlear system might instead be used to alter the hearing sensitivity during focus attention via frequency-specific modulation of afferent spontaneous activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: Neural mechanisms; Attention: Selective; Auditory efferent; Hearing; Olivocochlear

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389676     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02210-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans.

Authors:  M H Giard; A Fort; Y Mouchetant-Rostaing; J Pernier
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2000-01-01

Review 2.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention.

Authors:  H P Dai; B Scharf; S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory attentional bandwidth: effect of level and frequency range.

Authors:  M C Botte
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Cristian Aedo; Alex León; Macarena Bowen; Natalia Jara; Gonzalo Terreros; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07

7.  Decision rules in detection of simple and complex tones.

Authors:  S Buus; E Schorer; M Florentine; E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptive, behaviorally gated, persistent encoding of task-relevant auditory information in ferret frontal cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Stephen V David; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Pingbo Yin; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Tuning in to sound: frequency-selective attentional filter in human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sandra Da Costa; Wietske van der Zwaag; Lee M Miller; Stephanie Clarke; Melissa Saenz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Animal models of spontaneous activity in the healthy and impaired auditory system.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.