Literature DB >> 6459986

Paternal age and Down's syndrome: data from prenatal diagnoses (DFG).

J Stene, E Stene, S Stengel-Rutkowski, J D Murken.   

Abstract

From prenatal diagnosis data obtained on mothers aged 35 years and above in the Federal Republic of Germany (DFG data), older fathers are demonstrated to have an increased risk of having trisomy 21 offspring. For paternal ages of 41 years upward, the age effect is quite strong. The risk for a fetus to have any de novo chromosomal aberration increases more with advancing paternal age for older mothers than for younger ones. Thus the ages of both parents have to be taken into account as an indication for prenatal diagnosis. Risk figures for trisomy 21 and for any de novo chromosomal aberration are given, together with preliminary recommendations for prenatal diagnosis for different combinations of parental ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6459986     DOI: 10.1007/bf00293059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  11 in total

1.  Nondisjunction, consanguinity and parental ages.

Authors:  J Stene
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  On data and methods in investigations on parental-age effects. Comments on a paper by J. D. Erickson.

Authors:  J Stene; E Stene
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Reexamination of paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  E Matsunaga; A Tonomura; H Oishi; Y Kikuchi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-02-16       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Down syndrome, paternal age, maternal age and birth order.

Authors:  J D Erickson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Statistical methods for detecting a moderate paternal age effect on incidence of disorder when a maternal one is present.

Authors:  J Stene; E Stene
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  [Chromosome anomalies caused by surplus (trisomies) and age of the mother].

Authors:  W Lenz; R A Pfeiffer; W Tünte
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1966-07-15       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  On the inadequacy of quinquennial data for analyzing the paternal age effect on Down's syndrome rates.

Authors:  S H Lamson; P K Cross; E B Hook; R Regal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Role of consanguinity in chromosomal syndromes.

Authors:  R K Puri; K K Khanna; I Bhargava; S Balakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Paternal age and Down syndrome.

Authors:  J D Erickson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Stene; G Fischer; E Stene; M Mikkelsen; E Petersen
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  24 in total

1.  Controversy concerning paternal age effect in 47,+21 Down's syndrome.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Parental age and the origin of trisomy 21. A study of 302 families.

Authors:  F Dagna Bricarelli; M Pierluigi; M Landucci; A Arslanian; D A Coviello; M A Ferro; P Strigini
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Parental-age effects in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Santhosh Girirajan
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Paternal age and trisomy among spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  M Hatch; J Kline; B Levin; M Hutzler; D Warburton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Down's syndrome and the general practitioner.

Authors:  G Howells
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11

6.  An unexpected finding: younger fathers have a higher risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Bernhard Steiner; Rahim Masood; Kaspar Rufibach; Dunja Niedrist; Oliver Kundert; Mariluce Riegel; Albert Schinzel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  An analysis of paternal age and 47,+21 in 35,000 new prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis data from the New York State Chromosome Registry: no significant effect.

Authors:  P K Cross; E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Issues in analysis of data on paternal age and 47,+21: implications for genetic counseling for Down syndrome.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  On methodological issues regarding 47,+21 paternal age data.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  A reanalysis of the New York State prenatal diagnosis data on Down's syndrome and paternal age effects.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.