Literature DB >> 2961678

An analysis of paternal age and 47,+21 in 35,000 new prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis data from the New York State Chromosome Registry: no significant effect.

P K Cross1, E B Hook.   

Abstract

In 35,680 fetuses of women who had prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis done upon amniotic fluid specimens obtained during 2nd trimester amniocentesis and in whom there was no increased cytogenetic risk except for age, there was no statistically significant evidence for an increase of 47,+21 at any paternal age after adjustment for maternal age. The ratio of observed-to-expected numbers in fathers less than 30 years old was 1.0 and in fathers 40 years or older was 0.9 when compared with numbers derived from maternal-age-specific rates in men 30-39 years old. The ratio was 1.1 for those younger than 34 years when compared with rates in fathers aged 34-39 years old. Only for men 55 years or older was there any, even suggestive, increase. The ratio was roughly 1.5 (9 observed to about 6 expected). This was not statistically significant, and moreover, the increase such as it was, was in men married to women 37-42 years old. Regression analyses using several additive parental age models introducing a parabolic function for paternal age, failed to reveal any paternal age contribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2961678     DOI: 10.1007/bf00291415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  16 in total

1.  On data and methods in investigations on parental-age effects. Comments on a paper by J. D. Erickson.

Authors:  J Stene; E Stene
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Estimated rates of Down syndrome in live births by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20-49 in a New York State study-implications of the risk figures for genetic counseling and cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs.

Authors:  E B Hook; G M Chambers
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1977

3.  Down syndrome in live births by single year maternal age interval in a Swedish study: comparison with results from a New York State study.

Authors:  E B Hook; A Lindsjö
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Paternal age in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  N Mantel; C R Stark
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1967-05

5.  A reanalysis of the New York State prenatal diagnosis data on Down's syndrome and paternal age effects.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Parental age and unbalanced Robertsonian translocations associated with Down syndrome and Patau syndrome: comparison with maternal and paternal age effects for 47, +21 and 47, +13.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Paternal age and Down's syndrome genotypes diagnosed prenatally: no association in New York state data.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  The frequency of 47,+21,47,+18, and 47,+13 at the uppermost extremes of maternal ages: results on 56,094 fetuses studied prenatally and comparisons with data on livebirths.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; R R Regal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  A simple function for maternal-age-specific rates of Down syndrome in the 20-to-49-year age range and its biological implications.

Authors:  S H Lamson; E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Comparison of mathematical models for the maternal age dependence of Down's syndrome rates.

Authors:  S H Lamson; E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  8 in total

1.  Controversy concerning paternal age effect in 47,+21 Down's syndrome.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Paternal age and trisomy among spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  M Hatch; J Kline; B Levin; M Hutzler; D Warburton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Factual, statistical and logical issues in the search for a paternal age effect for Down syndrome.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; R R Regal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  An unexpected finding: younger fathers have a higher risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Bernhard Steiner; Rahim Masood; Kaspar Rufibach; Dunja Niedrist; Oliver Kundert; Mariluce Riegel; Albert Schinzel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Issues in analysis of data on paternal age and 47,+21: implications for genetic counseling for Down syndrome.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  On methodological issues regarding 47,+21 paternal age data.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  The relationship between paternal age, sex ratios, and aneuploidy frequencies in human sperm, as assessed by multicolor FISH.

Authors:  R H Martin; E Spriggs; E Ko; A W Rademaker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  P T Dick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.