Literature DB >> 148867

On data and methods in investigations on parental-age effects. Comments on a paper by J. D. Erickson.

J Stene, E Stene.   

Abstract

An analysis of the NIS data used by Erickson (1977) has revealed that this data contains too few Down's syndrome cases with older fathers. Thus the data is less suited for an investigation of a possible paternal age effect. In addition, the statistical tests used by Erickson have low power, so that they are unable to detect a moderate paternal-age effect. Our analysis has demonstrated that discussions on paternal-age effects and similar problems should be based on high-quality data. The investigation is better based on a small high-quality material than on a large one with serious underascertainment. In the latter case one has to be extremely careful because the missing observations nearly always have common characteristics which may cause serious bias of relevant kinds.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 148867     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1978.tb00917.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  9 in total

1.  An analysis of paternal age and 47,+21 in 35,000 new prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis data from the New York State Chromosome Registry: no significant effect.

Authors:  P K Cross; E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Paternal age and the occurrence of birth defects.

Authors:  Z H Lian; M M Zack; J D Erickson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Reexamination of paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  M P Roth; J Feingold; A Baumgarten; P Bigel; C Stoll
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  An analysis for paternal-age effect in Ohio's Down syndrome births, 1970-1980.

Authors:  G O Roecker; C A Huether
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Down syndrome associated with father's age in Norway.

Authors:  J D Erickson; T O Bjerkedal
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Down's syndrome: percentage reporting on birth certificates and single year maternal age risk rates for Ohio 1970-79: comparison with upstate New York data.

Authors:  C A Huether; G R Gummere; E B Hook; P S Dignan; H Volodkevich; M Barg; D A Ludwig; S H Lamson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Paternal age and Down's syndrome: data from prenatal diagnoses (DFG).

Authors:  J Stene; E Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski; J D Murken
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Maternal age and origin of non-disjunction in trisomy 21.

Authors:  J F Mattei; S Ayme; M G Mattei; F Giraud
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Paternal age and Down syndrome.

Authors:  J D Erickson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.025

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.