Literature DB >> 2961679

On methodological issues regarding 47,+21 paternal age data.

E Stene1, J Stene, S Stengel-Rutkowski.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 2961679     DOI： 10.1007/bf00291417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN： 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  An analysis of paternal age and 47,+21 in 35,000 new prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis data from the New York State Chromosome Registry: no significant effect.

Authors:  P K Cross; E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Issues in analysis of data on paternal age and 47,+21: implications for genetic counseling for Down syndrome.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  A reanalysis of the New York State prenatal diagnosis data on Down's syndrome and paternal age effects.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Paternal age and Down's syndrome: data from prenatal diagnoses (DFG).

Authors:  J Stene; E Stene; S Stengel-Rutkowski; J D Murken
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Stene; G Fischer; E Stene; M Mikkelsen; E Petersen
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.670
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Controversy concerning paternal age effect in 47,+21 Down's syndrome.

Authors:  E Stene; J Stene
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Paternal age and trisomy among spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  M Hatch; J Kline; B Levin; M Hutzler; D Warburton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Controversy concerning paternal age effect in 47, + 21 Down's syndrome.

Authors:  A D Carothers
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.132
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.