Literature DB >> 25005732

An unexpected finding: younger fathers have a higher risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies.

Bernhard Steiner1, Rahim Masood1, Kaspar Rufibach2, Dunja Niedrist1, Oliver Kundert1, Mariluce Riegel1, Albert Schinzel1.   

Abstract

The past decades have seen a remarkable shift in the demographics of childbearing in Western countries. The risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies with advancing maternal age is well known, but most studies failed to demonstrate a paternal age effect. Retrospectively, we analyzed two case data sets containing parental ages from pre- and postnatal cases with trisomies 21, 13 and 18. The reference data set contains the parental ages of the general Swiss population. We dichotomized all couples into two distinct groups. In the first group, the mothers' integral age was as least as the father's age or older. We compared the frequency of cases in nine 5-year intervals of maternal age. In addition, we computed logistic regression models for the binary endpoint aneuploidy yes/no where paternal ages were incorporated as linear or quadratic, as well as smooth functions within a generalized additive model framework. We demonstrated that the proportion of younger fathers is uniformly different between cases and controls of live-born trisomy 21 as well, although not reaching significance, for fetuses over all mother's ages. Logistic regression models with different strategies to incorporate paternal ages confirmed our findings. The negative paternal age effect was also found in pre- and postnatal cases taken together with trisomies 13 and 18. The couples with younger fathers face almost twofold odds for a child with Down syndrome (DS). We estimated odds curves for parental ages. If confirmation of these findings can be achieved, the management of couples at risk needs a major correction of the risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25005732      PMCID: PMC4666566          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  31 in total

Review 1.  Statistics notes. The odds ratio.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

2.  Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J K Morris; D E Mutton; E Alberman
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the prevalence of live births with Down syndrome in the eastern half of Switzerland 1980-1996.

Authors:  Franz Binkert; Michael Mutter; Albert Schinzel
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2002-08-24       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Differences between rates of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed in livebirths and in cells cultured after second-trimester amniocentesis--suggested explanations and implications for genetic counseling and program planning.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1978

5.  Reexamination of paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  E Matsunaga; A Tonomura; H Oishi; Y Kikuchi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-02-16       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A search for evidence for a paternal age effect independent of a maternal age effect in birth certificate reports of Down's syndrome in New York state.

Authors:  R R Regal; P K Cross; S H Lamson; E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Down syndrome associated with father's age in Norway.

Authors:  J D Erickson; T O Bjerkedal
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Paternal age and Down syndrome in British Columbia.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; S H Lamson; R R Regal; P A Baird; S H Uh
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study.

Authors:  Elise de la Rochebrochard; Patrick Thonneau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Stene; G Fischer; E Stene; M Mikkelsen; E Petersen
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Crossover Interference, Crossover Maturation, and Human Aneuploidy.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Yanlei Liu; Yongliang Shang; Binyuan Zhai; Xiao Yang; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Crossover maturation inefficiency and aneuploidy in human female meiosis.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Age-Dependent Alterations in Meiotic Recombination Cause Chromosome Segregation Errors in Spermatocytes.

Authors:  Maciej J Zelazowski; Maria Sandoval; Lakshmi Paniker; Holly M Hamilton; Jiaying Han; Mikalah A Gribbell; Rhea Kang; Francesca Cole
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Parental Age and Risk of Infant Leukaemia: A Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Erin L Marcotte; Todd E Druley; Kimberly J Johnson; Michaela Richardson; Julie von Behren; Beth A Mueller; Susan Carozza; Colleen McLaughlin; Eric J Chow; Peggy Reynolds; Logan G Spector
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Genetic and epigenetic profiling of the infertile male.

Authors:  Stephanie Cheung; Alessandra Parrella; Zev Rosenwaks; Gianpiero D Palermo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of paternal age on offspring birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yiwei Fang; Yongfeng Wang; Meilin Peng; Jia Xu; Zunpan Fan; Chunyan Liu; Kai Zhao; Huiping Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy; Zachary P Demko; Allison Ryan; Milena Banjevic; Matthew Hill; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Matthew Rabinowitz; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: state of the art in humans.

Authors:  G D Palermo; C L O'Neill; S Chow; S Cheung; A Parrella; N Pereira; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 9.  Crossover patterns under meiotic chromosome program.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Yongliang Shang; Yanlei Liu; Binyuan Zhai; Xiao Yang; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.