Literature DB >> 7040457

Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.

A L Barry, T L Gavan, R E Badal, M J Telenson.   

Abstract

Two independent laboratories tested 1,743 clinical isolates by using the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card in the AutoMicrobic system (AMS) and identical standard reference methods. Included were 55 isolates representing 11 species that cannot be identified by the enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card computer program; 3 or these isolates were incorrectly identified as Pseudomonas cepacia. With the other 1,688 isolates, 5% of the AMS identifications were considered to be equivocal (probability value, less than 0.80), and the remaining test were 97% accurate (sensitive), Difficulty was observed in the ability of the AMS to identify some H2S-negative Citrobacter freundii species. An AMS response of P. cepacia was also considered nonspecific, because several other organisms were misidentified at P. cepacia. Reproducibility of the system was documented by testing 125 strains on 3-separate days; only 6 strains produced significantly variable results. The AMS (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card) was a very satisfactory, automated system for accurately identifying most gram-negative bacilli within 8 to 13 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7040457      PMCID: PMC272148          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.582-588.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of an automated, computerized system (automicrobic system) for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

Authors:  N M Burdash; G Teti; M E West; E R Bannister; J P Manos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; T L Gavan; P B Smith; A Sonnenwirth; W Taylor; W J Martin; D Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J W Freeman; R W Rowland; S B Overman; N L Goodman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J J Hasyn; K R Cundy; C C Dietz; W Wong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D Sahm; C O'Hara; C Ciaglia; M Yu; N Yamane; G Scharnweber; D Rhoden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the automicrobic system, acridine orange-stained smears, and gram-stained smears in detecting bacteriuria.

Authors:  B A Lipsky; J J Plorde; F C Tenover; F P Brancato
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M J Bale; K R Schulte; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.

Authors:  J J Plorde; J A Gates; L G Carlson; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Spectral analysis of biochemical reactions used for identification of bacteria.

Authors:  A E Hilger; M V Lancaster
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Evaluation of the automicrobic system for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the automicrobic system for detection of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Recovery of uncommon bacteria from blood: association with neoplastic disease.

Authors:  J L Beebe; E W Koneman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; T Preston; M Bale; F P Koontz; B A Body
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.