Literature DB >> 19703532

Effects of neonatal partial deafness and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on auditory and electrical response characteristics in primary auditory cortex.

James B Fallon1, Robert K Shepherd, Mel Brown, Dexter R F Irvine.   

Abstract

The use of cochlear implants in patients with severe hearing losses but residual low-frequency hearing raises questions concerning the effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation (ICES) on cortical responses to auditory and electrical stimuli. We investigated these questions by studying responses to tonal and electrical stimuli in primary auditory cortex (AI) of two groups of neonatally deafened cats with residual high-threshold, low-frequency hearing. One group were implanted with a multi-channel intracochlear electrode at 8 weeks of age, and received chronic ICES for up to 9 months before cortical recording. Cats in the other group were implanted immediately prior to cortical recording as adults. In all cats in both groups, multi-neuron responses throughout the rostro-caudal extent of AI had low characteristic frequencies (CFs), in the frequency range of the residual hearing, and high-thresholds. Threshold and minimum latency at CF did not differ between the groups, but in the chronic ICES animals there was a higher proportion of electrically but not acoustically excited recording sites. Electrical response thresholds were higher and latencies shorter in the chronically stimulated animals. Thus, chronic implantation and ICES affected the extent of AI that could be activated by acoustic stimuli and resulted in changes in electrical response characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19703532      PMCID: PMC2803318          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  58 in total

1.  Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.

Authors:  Jan Kiefer; Marcel Pok; Oliver Adunka; Ekkehard Stürzebecher; Wolfgang Baumgartner; Marcus Schmidt; Jochen Tillein; Qing Ye; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Authors:  P Blamey; P Arndt; F Bergeron; G Bredberg; J Brimacombe; G Facer; J Larky; B Lindström; J Nedzelski; A Peterson; D Shipp; S Staller; L Whitford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Optical imaging of cat auditory cortical organization after electrical stimulation of a multichannel cochlear implant: differential effects of acute and chronic stimulation.

Authors:  H R Dinse; G Reuter; S M Cords; B Godde; T Hilger; T Lenarz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

4.  Neuronal responses across cortical field A1 in plasticity induced by peripheral auditory organ damage.

Authors:  R Rajan; D R Irvine
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1998 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo.

Authors:  C Q Huang; R K Shepherd; P M Carter; P M Seligman; B Tabor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  R Rajan; D R Irvine; L Z Wise; P Heil
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.

Authors:  M W Raggio; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.

Authors:  J Xu; R K Shepherd; R E Millard; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Onset of ototoxicity in the cat is related to onset of auditory function.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; R L Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation.

Authors:  R Snyder; P Leake; S Rebscher; R Beitel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Competition and convergence between auditory and cross-modal visual inputs to primary auditory cortical areas.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Mao; Tian-Miao Hua; Sarah L Pallas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  S Irving; A K Wise; R E Millard; R K Shepherd; J B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Intracochlear electrical stimulation suppresses apoptotic signaling in rat spiral ganglion neurons after deafening in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kopelovich; Alain P Cagaanan; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Steven H Green
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies.

Authors:  Robert Shepherd; Kristien Verhoeven; Jin Xu; Frank Risi; James Fallon; Andrew Wise
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Second spatial derivative analysis of cortical surface potentials recorded in cat primary auditory cortex using thin film surface arrays: Comparisons with multi-unit data.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Sam Irving; Satinderpall S Pannu; Angela C Tooker; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Behavioral frequency discrimination ability of partially deafened cats using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yuri B Benovitski; Peter J Blamey; Graeme D Rathbone; James B Fallon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Temporal bone characterization and cochlear implant feasibility in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Can training extend current guidelines for cochlear implant candidacy?

Authors:  Amal Isaiah; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 10.  Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.

Authors:  S Irving; L Gillespie; R Richardson; D Rowe; J B Fallon; A K Wise
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.