Literature DB >> 17225416

Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Colleen G Le Prell1, Kohei Kawamoto, Yehoash Raphael, David F Dolan.   

Abstract

When sinusoidal electric stimulation is applied to the intact cochlea, a frequency-specific acoustic emission can be recorded in the ear canal. Acoustic emissions are produced by basilar membrane motion, and have been used to suggest a corresponding acoustic sensation termed "electromotile hearing." Electromotile hearing has been specifically attributed to electric stimulation of outer hair cells in the intact organ of Corti. To determine the nature of the auditory perception produced by electric stimulation of a cochlea with intact outer hair cells, guinea pigs were tested in a psychophysical task. First, subjects were trained to report detection of sinusoidal acoustic stimuli and dynamic range was assessed using response latency. Subjects were then implanted with a ball electrode placed into scala tympani. Following the surgical implant procedure, subjects were transferred to a task in which acoustic signals were replaced by sinusoidal electric stimulation, and dynamic range was assessed again. Finally, the ability of acoustic pure-tone stimuli to mask the detection of the electric signals was assessed. Based on the masking effects, it is concluded that sinusoidal electric stimulation of the intact cochlea results in perception of a tonal (rather than a broadband or noisy) sound at a frequency of 8 kHz or above.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17225416      PMCID: PMC3132799          DOI: 10.1121/1.2359238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  100 in total

1.  Effect of inner and outer hair cell lesions on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  S Reyes; D Ding; W Sun; R Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.

Authors:  R S Tyler; D M Kelsay; H F Teagle; J T Rubinstein; B J Gantz; A M Christ
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

3.  Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum.

Authors:  A E Hubbard; D C Mountain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry.

Authors:  R C Black; G M Clark; S J O'Leary; C Walters
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1983

5.  Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Y C Tong; G M Clark; P J Blamey; P A Busby; R C Dowell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Biophysical measurements in the implanted cochlea.

Authors:  F A Spelman; B E Pfingst; J M Miller; M Hassul; W E Powers; B M Clopton
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979)       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr

7.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.

Authors:  F A Spelman; B M Clopton; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  Operating ranges and intensity psychophysics for cochlear implants. Implications for speech processing strategies.

Authors:  B E Pfingst
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1984-03

9.  Hearing thresholds in the rabbit. A behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  E Borg; B Engström
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Morphological changes in the normal and neomycin-perfused guinea pig cochlea following chronic prosthetic implantation.

Authors:  L G Duckert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  4 in total

1.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

3.  Effects of Calcitonin-Gene-Related-Peptide on Auditory Nerve Activity.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Larry F Hughes; David F Dolan; Sanford C Bledsoe
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-12

Review 4.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.