Literature DB >> 6227686

Parafoveal visual information and semantic contextual constraints.

D A Balota, K Rayner.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported that examine the influence of semantic contextual constraints on an individual's ability to use parafoveal visual information. Subjects were presented either a word (reptile) or a row of Xs in foveal vision along with a parafoveal nonword (snckks) centered 2.3 degrees or 5 degrees to the left or right of fixation. The subjects were asked to pronounce the parafoveal stimulus aloud. During their eye movement to that stimulus, the nonword was replaced by a word that was either (a) semantically related to the foveal item and visually related to the parafoveal preview nonword (snakes), (b) semantically unrelated to the foveal item and visually related to the preview (sneaks), (c) semantically related to the foveal item and visually unrelated to the preview (lizard), or (d) semantically unrelated to the foveal item and visually unrelated to the preview (limits). In Experiment 1, subjects were only given 250 msec to use the semantic context, whereas in Experiment 2, subjects were given 1,250 msec. The results of both experiments yielded highly significant effects of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information. However, the first experiment yielded additive effects of the two variables, whereas the second experiment yielded interactive effects. The results are discussed in light of recent arguments regarding the importance of contextual constraints for the use of parafoveal visual information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6227686     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.5.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  On the role of refixations in letter strings: the influence of oculomotor factors.

Authors:  T A Nazir
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

2.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect.

Authors:  F Vitu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

3.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; M Mittau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

4.  Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; David A Balota
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-04

5.  Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading.

Authors:  Noor Al-Zanoon; Michael Dambacher; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-11

6.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

7.  Effects of presentation complexity on rapid-sequential reading.

Authors:  H Chen; A F Healy; L E Bourne
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-11

8.  Interaction of stimulus and contextual information during reading: identifying words within sentences.

Authors:  T Sanocki; K Goldman; J Waltz; C Cook; W Epstein; G C Oden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-03

9.  The influence of scene context on parafoveal processing of objects.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Effie J Pereira
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.143

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.