Literature DB >> 1881766

The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect.

F Vitu1.   

Abstract

Several experiments have shown the existence of an optimal landing position effect during isolated word recognition as well as during text reading; both the probability of refixating the test word and the gaze duration are smaller if the eye first fixates near the center of the word than if the eye first fixates other positions in the word. However, recent data indicate that the optimal landing position effect is weakened under normal reading conditions, when words are included in texts. The purpose of the present experiment was to test whether parafoveal preprocessing or linguistic context specific to the text reading situation could be responsible for this weakening. With a paradigm that approximates normal reading, albeit in a somewhat slower manner, it was shown that although the possibility of preprocessing words in parafoveal vision and of predicting them from preceding context globally affected refixation probability and gaze duration on the word, this did not strongly affect the optimal landing position effect. Since the global effects of these factors were comparable to those found by other authors in normal reading, it was concluded that the weakening of the optimal landing position effect during text reading results from the influence of other factors peculiar to this situation. Hypotheses are proposed as explanations of the effects of the manipulated factors on oculomotor behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1881766     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  21 in total

1.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; M Mittau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

2.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.

Authors:  S D Lima; A W Inhoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

4.  Constraints on semantic priming in reading: a fixation time analysis.

Authors:  P Carroll; M L Slowiaczek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-11

5.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

6.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

7.  On priming by a sentence context.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-03

8.  Redundancy and word perception during reading.

Authors:  D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

9.  Integrating information across eye movements.

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Eye movements and integrating information across fixations.

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie; S Ehrlich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  13 in total

1.  Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.

Authors:  A R Schmauder; R K Morris; D V Poynor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words.

Authors:  T A Nazir; D Heller; C Sussmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

3.  The ability of the saccadic system to change motor plans in scanning letter strings.

Authors:  Dorine Vergilino-Perez; Cécile Beauvillain
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

4.  Effects of grammatical categories on letter detection in continuous text.

Authors:  Denis Foucambert; Michael Zuniga
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-02

5.  On the role of refixations in letter strings: the influence of oculomotor factors.

Authors:  T A Nazir
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

6.  The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Xingshan Li; Barbara J Juhasz; Guoli Yan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

7.  Letter legibility and visual word recognition.

Authors:  T A Nazir; A M Jacobs; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

8.  Mindless reading revisited: eye movements during reading and scanning are different.

Authors:  K Rayner; M H Fischer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

9.  Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Mindless reading: eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; A W Inhoff; R Topolski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.