Literature DB >> 2030935

On the role of refixations in letter strings: the influence of oculomotor factors.

T A Nazir1.   

Abstract

Recent studies of reading and word recognition have shown that eye-movement behavior depends strongly on the position in the word that the eye first fixates; the probability of refixating in a word is lowest with the eye near the middle of the word, and it increases as the eye fixates to either side. It has generally been assumed that the cause for this optimal landing position phenomenon lies in the very strong drop-off of visual acuity even within the fovea; refixation should be more likely when the eye starts from a noncentral position, because here less information can be extracted during one fixation. It may, however, be the case that the phenomenon is caused not by acuity drop-off, but by differences in within-word oculomotor scanning tactics as a function of the position that the eye initially fixates. To test this, in the present experiment we kept visual information constant while we varied the initial fixation position. We used homogeneous strings of letters of different length. One letter in each string was different from the rest (e.g., kkkkkok), and this was the letter that the subject initially fixated. This target letter had to be identified before saccading to a comparison string. The position of the target letter in the string was varied from trial to trial. If, owing to acuity limitations, refixations reflect insufficient information extraction, then, because the target letter is always directly fixated, the pattern of refixations in this condition should be independent of the first fixation position. However, the obtained refixation probability showed a strong dependence on the position of first fixation. The number of refixations was independent of the absolute length of the letter strings, but it seemed to be influenced by the proportion of the string over which the eye had to pass. The larger this proportion, the higher the probability of refixation. The results suggest that to a certain extent refixations in letter strings (or words) reflect properties of the oculomotor system rather than visual information extraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030935     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect.

Authors:  F Vitu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

2.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; M Mittau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

3.  Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word.

Authors:  G W McConkie; P W Kerr; M D Reddix; D Zola; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-09

4.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery.

Authors:  R J Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; A Lévy-Schoen; J Pynte; B Brugaillère
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Parafoveal visual information and semantic contextual constraints.

Authors:  D A Balota; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.

Authors:  D A Balota; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Eye movements and integrating information across fixations.

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie; S Ehrlich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Parafoveal word perception: a case against semantic preprocessing.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-05

10.  The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well; A Pollatsek; J H Bertera
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words.

Authors:  T A Nazir; D Heller; C Sussmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

2.  Letter legibility and visual word recognition.

Authors:  T A Nazir; A M Jacobs; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

3.  Mindless reading: eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; A W Inhoff; R Topolski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

4.  ERP characterization of sustained attention effects in visual lexical categorization.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Guillaume Thierry; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in Chinese.

Authors:  Pingping Liu; Danlu Liu; Buxin Han; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.