Literature DB >> 5970384

Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules.

M Yarczower, J F Dickson, L R Gollub.   

Abstract

The relationship between training conditions and stimulus generalization gradients was examined using tandem schedules of reinforcement. Schedules were selected so that frequency of reinforcement and rate of responding were varied somewhat independently of each other. A peak-shift in the generalization gradient was obtained when extinction had been associated with one of the stimuli. No comparable peak shift was obtained when there were equal response rates in the training stimuli even with dissimilar frequencies of reinforcement. The data imply that response rates at the end of training, rather than reinforcement frequency per se, determine the characteristics of the generalization gradient.

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5970384      PMCID: PMC1338256          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  WAVELENGTH GENERALIZATION AFTER DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT ERRORS.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: a test of the summation hypothesis.

Authors:  H I KALISH; N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-04

3.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

4.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

5.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG; D R THOMAS; N GUTTM AN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

7.  Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli.

Authors:  H I KALISH; N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-02

8.  Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1957-09

9.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS; A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  Some effects of response-independent reinforcement on auditory generalization gradients.

Authors:  R C Huff; J E Sherman; M Cohn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus control and the response-reinforcement contingency.

Authors:  M Yarczower; L R Gollub; J F Dickson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral contrast with timeout, blackout, or extinction as the negative condition.

Authors:  S Sadowsky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Relative and absolute density of reinforcement as factors influencing the peak shift.

Authors:  K L Wheatley; D R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Factors influencing inhibitory stimulus control: differential reinforcement of other behavior during discrimination training.

Authors:  R G Weisman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Discrimination training and stimulus compounding: consideration of non-reinforcement and response differentiation consequences of S.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.