Literature DB >> 16811666

Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule.

R W Richards.   

Abstract

The key pecking of six pigeons was reinforced according to a variable-interval 1-min schedule during each of two successively presented stimuli. When the key was illuminated by a black line on a white background, reinforcement was delayed for 10 sec. When the key was illuminated by a plain white light, reinforcement was not delayed. All subjects responded at a lower rate during the presentation of the black line. A subsequent generalization test along the line-orientation dimension produced a U-shaped gradient, with the nadir located at or near the training stimulus, for each subject. These gradients suggested that the lower rate of response during the stimulus associated with delayed reinforcement may have been due to an inhibition of responding.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811666      PMCID: PMC1334082          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

Authors:  D R THOMAS; J L WILLIAMS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

4.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

5.  Generalization of auditory intensity following discrimination training.

Authors:  R PIERREL; J G SHERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement delay: some effects on behavioral contrast.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  E Hearst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  J A Deutsch; H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules.

Authors:  M Yarczower; J F Dickson; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A peak shift on a line-tilt continuum.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  A J Marcattilio; R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Inhibitory stimulus control and the magnitude of delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.