Literature DB >> 16811376

Stimulus control and the response-reinforcement contingency.

M Yarczower, L R Gollub, J F Dickson.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained under a schedule in which reinforcement was made available at varying periods of time after a prior reinforcement. The first key peck after a reinforcer was available began a timer and a second key peck, which exceeded a specified minimal time interval, produced the reinforcer. It was shown that a contingency which contains a minimal interresponse time does not necessarily weaken stimulus control by an exteroceptive stimulus.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811376      PMCID: PMC1338648          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  3 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure.

Authors:  R H HISS; D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-06

3.  Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules.

Authors:  M Yarczower; J F Dickson; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.