Literature DB >> 16811319

Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.

J A Nevin.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to respond with equal variable-interval reinforcement in the presence of a white key and also a white key with a vertical line. They were then trained not to respond to the vertical line by extinguishing the response or by reinforcing its non-occurrence at various frequencies. During training, the rate of key-pecking in the presence of the white key, maintained by a constant variable-interval schedule of reinforcement, depended on the frequency of reinforcement in the presence of the line. When lines of different orientations were presented in a generalization test, birds trained with extinction responded more to other orientations than to the vertical line, whereas those trained with high frequencies of reinforcement for not responding tended to respond equally at all line orientations. Intermediate frequencies of reinforcement gave mixed results.

Year:  1968        PMID: 16811319      PMCID: PMC1338625          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some effects of discriminative training with equated frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  M Yarczower; L R Gollub; J F Dickson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules.

Authors:  M Yarczower; J F Dickson; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Two types of behavioral contrast in discrimination learning.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral contrast and relative reinforcement frequency in two multiple schedules.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  32 in total

1.  Selective sensitivity of schedule-induced activity to an operant suppression contingency.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast: Pavlovian effects and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  A D Hassin-Herman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A comparison of variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  R D Spealman; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Eliminating behavior with reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Temporal inhibition: effects of changes in rate of reinforcement and rate of responding.

Authors:  E G Carr; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of alternative reinforcement sources: A reevaluation.

Authors:  A A Imam; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.