Literature DB >> 16811804

Relative and absolute density of reinforcement as factors influencing the peak shift.

K L Wheatley, D R Thomas.   

Abstract

Four groups of six pigeons each were given nondifferential training on multiple variable-interval variable-interval reinforcement schedules and then were switched to differential training involving a multiple schedule in which reinforcement density was reduced in one of the two components. The multiple schedules used in the four groups had mean interreinforcement intervals of 1 min and 1 min in the two components changed to 1 min, 5 min; 2.5 min, 2.5 min changed to 2.5 min, 5 min; 12 sec, 12 sec changed to 12 sec, 24 sec; and 12 sec, 12 sec changed to 12 sec, 60 sec. In subsequently administered wavelength generalization tests, some peak shifts were observed in each condition and occurred occasionally in the absence of behavioral contrast or rate reduction in the less-reinforced component. The best predictor of peak shift was a high proportion of total responses emitted during the more-reinforced component at the end of differential training.

Entities:  

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811804      PMCID: PMC1333282          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Color mixing with Kodak Wratten filters.

Authors:  J Lyons; W D Klipec
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules.

Authors:  M Yarczower; J F Dickson; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Line-orientation generalization following signalled-reinforcer training.

Authors:  P Griffin; D J Stewart
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Interresponse-time analysis of stimulus control in multiple schedules.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.