Literature DB >> 5323393

Durable secondary reinforcement using brain stimulation as the primary reinforcer.

P D Knott, K N Clayton.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5323393     DOI: 10.1037/h0022879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area disrupts food-related learning in rats.

Authors:  Ruth Sharf; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The effects of (+)-amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer.

Authors:  E J Mazurski; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The effects of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning.

Authors:  D C Hoffman; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning.

Authors:  R J Beninger; D R Hanson; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R J Beninger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Amphetamine-induced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats: interactions with repeated testing.

Authors:  Todor V Gerdjikov; Tyson W Baker; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of cocaine, (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol.

Authors:  R J Beninger; D R Hanson; A G Phillips
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Bromocriptine enhancement of responding for conditioned reward depends on intact D1 receptor function.

Authors:  R Ranaldi; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists attenuate amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats.

Authors:  R Ranaldi; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.