Literature DB >> 3001808

The effects of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning.

D C Hoffman, R J Beninger.   

Abstract

In an attempt to understand some inconsistent findings, the present experiment investigated the effects of pimozide, a dopamine (DA) receptor blocker, on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning. In Experiment 1, rats received three phases of training in a two-lever box. The pre-exposure phase measured the operant rates of pressing the levers; one produced a 3-s tone and the other turned the lights off for 3 s. In the conditioning phase, with the levers absent, the light-off stimulus was paired with food for two or four sessions. The test phase again measured the rate of pressing the levers. Conditioned reinforcement was shown by a relative increase in responding on the light lever during the test. Of the groups receiving four conditioning sessions, pimozide (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent attenuation of conditioned reinforcement, those rats treated with 4.0 mg/kg failing to demonstrate a significant effect. When 2 conditioning days were employed, pimozide treatment also produced a dose-dependent attenuation; however, in these less conditioned animals 2.0 mg/kg blocked the effect. The possibility that pimozide produced a conditioned taste aversion to the food was ruled out in Experiment 2. These data suggest that DA transmission may be necessary for the establishment of conditioned reinforcement and that the effects of receptor blockade may be related to the amount of conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3001808     DOI: 10.1007/bf00432512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

1.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits.

Authors:  G Fouriezos; R A Wise
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcer for operant responses.

Authors:  P J BERSH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-01

3.  A temporal gradient of derived reinforcement.

Authors:  W O JENKINS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-04

4.  Is the low incidence of extrapyramidal side-effects of antipsychotics associated with antimuscarinic properties?

Authors:  P M Laduron; J E Leysen
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 5.  A systematic study of the pharmacological activities of dopamine antagonists.

Authors:  C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1979-06-11       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 6.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

7.  An examination of methodological refinements, clozapine and fluphenazine in the anhedonia paradigm.

Authors:  W O Faustman; S C Fowler
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats.

Authors:  R J Beninger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 9.  The role of dopamine in locomotor activity and learning.

Authors:  R J Beninger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effects of (+)-amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer.

Authors:  E J Mazurski; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Devazepide, a CCKA receptor antagonist, impairs the acquisition of conditioned reward and conditioned activity.

Authors:  S A Josselyn; V P Franco; F J Vaccarino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Amphetamine-induced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats: interactions with repeated testing.

Authors:  Todor V Gerdjikov; Tyson W Baker; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effects of d-amphetamine on responding under second-order schedules of reinforcement with paired and nonpaired brief stimuli.

Authors:  S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  S L Cohen; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Bromocriptine enhancement of responding for conditioned reward depends on intact D1 receptor function.

Authors:  R Ranaldi; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists attenuate amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats.

Authors:  R Ranaldi; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.