Literature DB >> 6115694

The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of cocaine, (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol.

R J Beninger, D R Hanson, A G Phillips.   

Abstract

1 A procedure for examining the acquisition of a lever-pressing operant with conditioned reinforcement was used to compare the effects of three psychomotor stimulants. 2 Hungry rats were trained to associated and auditory tone (i.e., conditioned reinforcer) with food. Preference for the tone was then measured after treatment with pipradol (5, 10, 15 mg/kg), cocaine (1, 5, 10 mg/kg) or (+)-amphetamine (0.5, 1.5, 5.0 mg/kg). 3 In agreement with previous data, 10 mg/kg of pipradrol enhanced the effect of conditioned reinforcement whereas animals treated with any of the doses of (+)-amphetamine showed no effect. 4 Rats treated with cocaine (1 or 5 mg/kg) showed an effect of conditioned reinforcement but the effect was not significantly greater than in controls. 5 The present data suggest important differences in enhancement of responding for conditioned reinforcement by various drugs in the psychomotor stimulant class. These differences in turn may be related to the pharmacological actions of these compounds on release of catecholamines from different storage pools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6115694      PMCID: PMC2071882          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb09967.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  8 in total

1.  Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sustained performance in rats based on secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  D W ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-06

3.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation.

Authors:  T W Robbins; G F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Comparative studies of various amphetamine analogues demonstrating different interactions with the metabolism of the catecholamines in the brain.

Authors:  J Scheel-Krüger
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Durable secondary reinforcement using brain stimulation as the primary reinforcer.

Authors:  P D Knott; K N Clayton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

7.  The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning.

Authors:  R J Beninger; D R Hanson; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R J Beninger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

  8 in total
  25 in total

1.  Enhanced food-related motivation after bilateral lesions of the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Christelle Baunez; Marianne Amalric; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. I. Differential effects of amphetamine microinjections into striatal subregions.

Authors:  A E Kelley; J M Delfs
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The effects of (+)-amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer.

Authors:  E J Mazurski; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Tolerance to and residual effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys depend on reinforcement-schedule parameter.

Authors:  C E Hughes; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Individual variation in the motivational properties of cocaine.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Behavioral mechanisms underlying nicotine reinforcement.

Authors:  Laura E Rupprecht; Tracy T Smith; Rachel L Schassburger; Deanne M Buffalari; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015

7.  Effects of novelty and methamphetamine on conditioned and sensory reinforcement.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Michael A Kausch; Amy M Gancarz; Linda J Beyley; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Influence of conditioned reinforcement on the response-maintaining effects of quinpirole in rats.

Authors:  Gregory T Collins; James H Woods
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  S L Cohen; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; F Fay Evans-Martin; Sheri Booth; Maysa A Gharib; Laure A Clements; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.