Literature DB >> 7862816

Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists attenuate amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats.

R Ranaldi1, R J Beninger.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the dopamine D1 receptor may play an important role in reward. The present study was undertaken to investigate the roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in responding for conditioned reward. This was done by examining the effects of the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 and the D2 antagonists pimozide and metoclopramide on amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward. The procedure consisted of three distinct phases. During the pre-exposure phase the rats were exposed to an operant chamber containing two levers. One lever produced a lights-off stimulus (3 s) and the other a tone stimulus (3 s). This was followed by four conditioning sessions during which the levers were removed and the rats were exposed to pairings of the lights-off stimulus with food. This phase was followed by two test sessions during which the levers were present and the number of responses made on each was calculated as a ratio of the number of responses made during the pre-exposure phase. A group receiving the vehicle during the test sessions showed a greater ratio of responding for the lights-off stimulus than the tone stimulus, indicating that the lights-off stimulus had become a conditioned reward. Amphetamine (0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg/kg, IP, 5 min prior to test) specifically enhanced responding on the lever producing conditioned reward. SCH 23390 (5.0 and 10.0 micrograms/kg, SC, 2 h before test) and pimozide (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, IP, 4 h before test) dose-dependently shifted the peak in the amphetamine dose-response function to the right, indicating an attenuation of conditioned reward.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7862816     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  63 in total

Review 1.  The psychobiology of reinforcers.

Authors:  N M White; P M Milner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of D2 dopamine receptor blockade with raclopride on intracranial self-stimulation and food-reinforced operant behaviour.

Authors:  S Nakajima; J D Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation.

Authors:  T W Robbins; G F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  5HT-receptor antagonist properties of SCH 23390 in vascular smooth muscle and brain.

Authors:  P E Hicks; H Schoemaker; S Z Langer
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding.

Authors:  P Willner; K Chawla; D Sampson; S Sophokleous; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Discrimination of functionally heterogeneous receptor subpopulations: antipsychotic and antidopaminergic properties of metoclopramide [proceedings].

Authors:  J Rotrosen; M Stanley; A Lautin; D Wazer; S Gershon
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1981-01

8.  Effects of continuous infusions of SCH 23390 on cocaine- or food-maintained behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M.S. Kleven; W.L. Woolverton
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Increased dopamine metabolism in the nucleus accumbens and striatum following consumption of a nutritive meal but not a palatable non-nutritive saccharin solution.

Authors:  J R Blackburn; A G Phillips; A Jakubovic; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 10.  Brain dopamine and reward.

Authors:  R A Wise; P P Rompre
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

View more
  15 in total

1.  Cocaine self-administration disrupts mesolimbic dopamine circuit function and attenuates dopaminergic responsiveness to cocaine.

Authors:  Cody A Siciliano; Mark J Ferris; Sara R Jones
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Amphetamine modulates brain signal variability and working memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Douglas D Garrett; Irene E Nagel; Claudia Preuschhof; Agnieszka Z Burzynska; Janina Marchner; Steffen Wiegert; Gerhard J Jungehülsing; Lars Nyberg; Arno Villringer; Shu-Chen Li; Hauke R Heekeren; Lars Bäckman; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor agonists and antagonists on responding for a conditioned reinforcer and its enhancement by methylphenidate.

Authors:  Paul J Fletcher; Fiona D Zeeb; Caleb J Browne; Guy A Higgins; Ashlie D Soko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The effects of adolescent methylphenidate self-administration on responding for a conditioned reward, amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, and neuronal activation.

Authors:  Christie L Burton; José N Nobrega; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Amphetamine-induced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats: interactions with repeated testing.

Authors:  Todor V Gerdjikov; Tyson W Baker; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Enhanced incentive motivation for sucrose-paired cues in adolescent rats: possible roles for dopamine and opioid systems.

Authors:  Christie L Burton; Kevin Noble; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Rostral-caudal differences in the effects of intra-VTA muscimol on cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  David Y Lee; Matthew Guttilla; Kinsun D Fung; Stacey McFeron; Jerry Yan; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Bupropion and nicotine enhance responding for nondrug reinforcers via dissociable pharmacological mechanisms in rats.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Melissa E Levin; Kara L Mays; Eric C Donny; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  D1-receptor drugs and cocaine-seeking behavior: investigation of receptor mediation and behavioral disruption in rats.

Authors:  Andrea T Alleweireldt; Kenneth F Kirschner; Camille B Blake; Janet L Neisewander
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Neurobiology of reward-related learning.

Authors:  Ewa Galaj; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.