Literature DB >> 6106257

The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning.

R J Beninger, D R Hanson, A G Phillips.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that pipradrol enhances the acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement. The present experiments replicated this finding and assessed the possible role of nonspecific stimulus change, feeding in the test environment and prior exposure to the conditioned stimulus. The test procedure consisted of three phases: Operant rates of pressing two levers, one of which produced a 3-s tone, were measured in the pre-exposure phase; the tone was paired with food in the four conditioning sessions; and conditioned reinforcement was demonstrated in the test phase by a relative increase in pressing the tone lever. A group (N = 8) receiving food but no tone during the conditioning phase also increased responding on the tone lever in the test phase and this effect was enhanced in a group (N = 8) receiving pipradrol prior to the test. A group (N = 8) receiving neither tones nor pellets during conditioning and pipradrol prior to test failed to show a change in lever bias, ruling out the possibility that pipradrol produced a nonspecific enhancement of responding for stimulus change. It was hypothesized that the conditioned reinforcement effect seen in the food-alone groups resulted from sensory preconditioning. According to this hypothesis, the tone was conditioned to environmental stimuli during the pre-exposure phase; subsequent presentation of pellets resulted in a learned association between environmental stimuli and food, leading to increased responding for the tone in the test phase. The results of two control experiments supported this view. One group (N = 8) received no tone in the pre-exposure phase, pellets alone in the conditioning phase and then pipradrol prior to test. The second group, but under altered environmental stimulus conditions, and then was given pipradrol prior to test. Neither group showed evidence of conditioned reinforcement. It was concluded that pipradrol enhanced acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement even if the conditioned reinforceing stimulus was established with sensory preconditioning procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6106257     DOI: 10.1007/bf00433088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

1.  Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sustained performance in rats based on secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  D W ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-06

3.  Effects and interactions of imipramine, chlorpromazine, reserpine and amphetamine on self-stimulation: possible neurophysiological basis of depression.

Authors:  L STEIN
Journal:  Recent Adv Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1961

4.  Effects of amphetamine, chlorpromazine and pentobarbital on behavioral theromoregulation.

Authors:  B WEISS; V G LATIES
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  A review of sensory preconditioning.

Authors:  R J SEIDEL
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation.

Authors:  T W Robbins; G F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 8.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

9.  Durable secondary reinforcement using brain stimulation as the primary reinforcer.

Authors:  P D Knott; K N Clayton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

10.  The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R J Beninger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. I. Differential effects of amphetamine microinjections into striatal subregions.

Authors:  A E Kelley; J M Delfs
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli reveal multiple roles for nicotine in reinforcement.

Authors:  Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens, but not of the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine.

Authors:  J R Taylor; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The effects of (+)-amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer.

Authors:  E J Mazurski; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Robust conditioned flavor preferences with a sensory preconditioning procedure.

Authors:  E A Lyn; E D Capaldi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of cocaine, (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol.

Authors:  R J Beninger; D R Hanson; A G Phillips
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Responding for conditioned reinforcement in C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice, and Sprague-Dawley rats: Effects of methylphenidate and amphetamine.

Authors:  J D Caleb Browne; Ashlie D Soko; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Potentiation of the effects of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic-dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  M Cador; J R Taylor; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of cocaine on briefly signaled versus completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D J Walker; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  S L Cohen; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.