Literature DB >> 7568630

Bromocriptine enhancement of responding for conditioned reward depends on intact D1 receptor function.

R Ranaldi1, R J Beninger.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that reward-related learning may require intact functioning at the dopamine D1 receptor. The present experiment tested this hypothesis by challenging the reward-enhancing effects of the D2 agonist, bromocriptine, with a D1 antagonist, SCH 23390. For comparison, the effects of the D2 antagonist, pimozide, were also evaluated. Male rats (n = 240) were pre-exposed to a chamber with two levers, one producing a 3-s lights-off stimulus and the other a 3-s tone stimulus. Four conditioning sessions followed, during which levers were absent and presentations of the lights-off stimulus were paired with food. Testing consisted of comparing presses on each lever after conditioning to before conditioning for each rat. Control groups showed a significantly greater increase in responding for lights-off than tone, indicating that the lights-off stimulus had become a conditioned reward. Results showed that bromocriptine (0.25-10.0 mg/kg, IP, 60 min before test session) enhanced responding at doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg significantly more on the conditioned reward lever than on the other lever. The lowest dose of SCH 23390 (1.0 microgram/kg, SC, 2 h before testing) eliminated the bromocriptine-produced enhancement at 2.5 mg/kg and a significant enhancement was seen at 10.0 mg/kg. The higher doses of SCH 23390 (5.0 and 10.0 micrograms/kg) eliminated the bromocriptine effect and the conditioned reward effect itself, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7568630     DOI: 10.1007/BF02245944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  53 in total

1.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The dopamine D2 receptor agonists, quinpirole and bromocriptine produce conditioned place preferences.

Authors:  D C Hoffman; P R Dickson; R J Beninger
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation.

Authors:  T W Robbins; G F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size.

Authors:  R Pickens; T Thompson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Dopamine D1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens: involvement in the reinforcing effect of tegmental stimulation.

Authors:  S Kurumiya; S Nakajima
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-05-10       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Increased lever pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: implications for a dopamine theory of reward.

Authors:  R A Yokel; R A Wise
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; D Karras
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 8.  Brain dopamine and reward.

Authors:  R A Wise; P P Rompre
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  The role of dopamine in locomotor activity and learning.

Authors:  R J Beninger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhancement of locomotor activity and conditioned reward to cocaine by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

Authors:  B A Horger; C A Iyasere; M T Berhow; C J Messer; E J Nestler; J R Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.