Literature DB >> 16812491

Sensitivity to reinforcer duration in a self-control procedure.

K G White, M E Pipe.   

Abstract

In a concurrent-chains procedure, pigeons' responses on left and right keys were followed by reinforcers of different durations at different delays following the choice responses. Three pairs of reinforcer delays were arranged in each session, and reinforcer durations were varied over conditions. In Experiment 1 reinforcer delays were unequal, and in Experiment 2 reinforcer delays were equal. In Experiment 1 preference reversal was demonstrated in that an immediate short reinforcer was chosen more frequently than a longer reinforcer delayed 6 s from the choice, whereas the longer reinforcer was chosen more frequently when delays to both reinforcers were lengthened. In both experiments, choice responding was more sensitive to variations in reinforcer duration at overall longer reinforcer delays than at overall shorter reinforcer delays, independently of whether fixed-interval or variable-interval schedules were arranged in the choice phase. We concluded that preference reversal results from a change in sensitivity of choice responding to ratios of reinforcer duration as the delays to both reinforcers are lengthened.

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812491      PMCID: PMC1338728          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

Review 1.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules.

Authors:  D Macewen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Impulse control in pigeons.

Authors:  G W Ainslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.

Authors:  M Davison; I Hogsden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: Toward a choice model of self control.

Authors:  L Green; M Snyderman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Connectionist models of conditioning: A tutorial.

Authors:  E J Kehoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relative sensitivity to reinforcer amount and delay in a self-control choice situation.

Authors:  M Ito; M Oyama
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.